Archives for posts with tag: SR-71

Prologue

In the Research & Development Gallery at the National Museum of the USAF near Dayton, Ohio stands an aircraft towering over all the other aircraft in the gallery, the centre piece, in the shadow of its wings stand several other aircraft appearing to shelter there.

This is the XB-70 Valkyrie, arguably one of the most influential aircraft of all time.

The XB-70 Valkyrie with the B-58 Hustler

The Nuclear Deterrence

Before we dive into the XB-70 Valkyrie, it’s important to understand the backdrop which led to her development.

The 1945 nuclear events of Hiroshima and Nagasaki clearly established the importance of nuclear deterrence. The cold war was ramping up and the modified B-29s used to deliver the nuclear ordnance were inadequate. 

The Enola Gay & Bockscar the two B-29s that dropped the atom bombs on Hiroshima & Nagasaki.

By 1941 Britain was at the risk of falling to Nazi Germany. America was looking for a new bomber that had at least a 5,700 mile range ( Gander – Berlin roundtrip), the ability to deliver a 10,000 pound ordnence load and return. Furthermore the bomber had to have a service ceiling of 40,000 feet and a cruising speed of approx 275 mph. The events of Pearl Harbor ensured the B-36 would only enter service post WW2.

The ten engined B-36 Peacemaker

Convair won the contract and the aircraft was originally designated the B-35, later switched to B-36 to avoid overlap and confusion with the Northrup YB-35 flying wing. The aircraft first flown in 1948 was huge with a wingspan of 230 feet and a length of 162 feet, was propelled by six pusher props. Later models had four turbojets  on the outboard wings making a total of ten power plants ‘ Six Turning & Four Burning’(the maximum on any production bomber aircraft ever), could carry over 80,000 pounds of ordnance. 

The ten engined B-36 . Six turning & four burning

The B-36 was relegated to obsolescence with the advent of the MIG 15 over North Korea by 1950. It was too slow for the faster interceptors Russia was producing. America needed an all jet powered bomber that was quicker.

The B-47 Stratojet entered operational service in 1951. While the requirement goes back to 1943 for a jet powered reconnaissance bomber, the original model 424 was essentially a version of the B-29 . Following the 1945 inspections of captured top secret German documents on swept wings the jet powered game pivoted on its head. With a 35 degree sweep and a wingspan of 116 feet with wings mounted on the fuselage shoulder, the aircraft was powered by six turbojets. The nuclear capable bomber had a max payload of 25,000 pounds and a range of  2500 miles. With a cruise speed of approx 500 mph the B-47 was the backbone of the Strategic Air Command’s ( SAC) bomber fleet through the 1950s. (Note: The B-45 operated from 1947-59 however had many shortcomings that severely curtailed its usefulness)

The six turbojet engined B-47. The very first jet engined bomber ever.

While the B-47 operated in tandem with the B-36 there was a clear gap in the Range / Payload / Speed doctrine and most importantly reliability, enter the B-52.

The eight jet B-52 is a venerable veteran among bombers globally, first entering service in 1955 and still in active service to this day. With a wingspan of 185 feet and a length of 159 feet, the aircraft cruises at 525 mph, has a range of 8,800 miles and service ceiling of 50,000 feet. The aircraft can carry 70,000 pounds of ordnance and is nuclear capable. 

The legendary B-52 with its eight engines. In service for 70 years and counting.
The B-52 prototype with a B-36 in the background.

Through the 1950s aircraft got faster and the push for air superiority quickly moved aircraft into the supersonic era. Starting with Gen. Chuck Yeager’s famous 1947 first in the Glamorous Glennis. Aircraft such as the F-86 Sabre and the F-100 Supersabre made sure that supersonic was here to stay. The Russians were making supersonic strides themselves with their MIG 19 ‘Farmer ‘ . Bombers needed to go supersonic.

The B-58 Hustler. The very first supersonic bomber.

The B-58 was designed with nuclear strike capability and was the very first operational Mach 2 bomber. While the B-58 was a clear statement of intent the aircraft had a limited range of 4,000 miles and payload capacity of approx 20,000 pounds. The delta wing (a recent innovation) made low speed handling very difficult and the aircraft had a high incident rate. SAC issued a fresh directive for new aircraft.

WS-110A

In 1955 the SAC  issued ‘ General Operational Requirement No. 38 ‘ the foundation for an operational bomber that had the capabilities of both the B-52 and the B-58. The conventional fuel powered jet version of this requirement was called ‘ Weapons System 110A ‘ or WS-110A.

The specifications of the bomber was a cruising speed of Mach 0.9, 50,000 pound payload and a combat radius of 4,000 miles. Boeing & North American Aviation both were included in round one of the development along with other leading companies.

By the mid 1950s USSR in addition to its supersonic fighters such as the MIG-19 had SAMs (Surface to Air Missile). The missiles were a threat to a Mach 0.9 aircraft. The rules of engagement changed to a Mach 3 heavy strategic bomber and a cruising altitude of 70,000 feet.

The initial designs from both companies had take-off weights in excess of 750,000 pounds and both the proposals were dismissed ‘ being too large ‘. Gen Curtis LeMay, the commander in chief of the SAC is said to have commented on seeing one of the proposals “ this is not a bomber, it is a three ship formation!”

Both companies were told to refine designs.

The NAA & Boeing initial designs for the WS110A.

NACA Supersonic Studies

In 1951 Richard Whitcomb put forward the ‘ Area Rule’. His discovery stated that ‘ Total cross sectional area ‘ of the aircraft was responsible for drag in the transonic ( Mach 0.8 – 1.2) regime and not just the wing cross section. This finding resulted in the ‘coke bottle fuselage’ , a narrowing of the fuselage where the wing cross section came into play.

In 1956 A J Eggers & Clarence A Syverton published ‘ Aircraft configurations developing high lift-drag ratios at high supersonic speeds’. The principle investigated the design concepts of aircraft at high supersonic speeds. The long title would come to be known as compression lift or wave riding.

The 1951 ‘Area Rule’ was first tested on the redesigned F-102A Delta Dagger. The rule which required the original F-102 to be lengthened by 11 feet , with narrowed coke bottle design in the middle, a new canopy along with redesigned wings and a pushed back tail, resulted in a much faster , more stable aircraft that comfortably sustained Supersonic speeds.

A design schematic of the F-104A design changes over the F-104 implementing ‘Area Rule’

The 1956 internal memorandum was studied in detail by NAA and they figured compression lift had to be central to the WS-110A design philosophy along with area rule.

By early 1958 the WS-110A would be officially designated the XB-70. The Air Force had transitioned the project from a concept ( Weapons System or WS) to an experimental program (XB). The name Valkyrie was the winning name submitted by Sgt. Francis Seller in a naming contest held by the USAF. Valkyrie the Norse Goddess is the ‘chooser of the slain’, guides souls lost in battle to Valhalla(the hall of heroes). Valkyrie was chosen from over 20,000 suggestions.

The Canards & Forebody

The XB-70 experienced significant ‘ Mach Tuck’ at high Mach speeds. This was caused by the centre of pressure moving aft as the aircraft accelerated through the speed regime.

The automatic canards managed by the FACS (Flight Control Augmentation System) adjusted continuously to manage the tuck. With a span of 28 feet they were significant in trimming out pitch shifts and helped smooth shock transitions.

The canards & forebody of the XB-70. Sr-71 in the foreground.

The canards worked in conjunction with the elevons on the wing’s trailing edges. 

The forebody of the XB-70 like most supersonic aircraft today was sharply tapered through to the canards. The underside as were the sides were not only flat and shallow, but also contoured to create the primary shockwave.

The XB-70 dimensions.

Behind the nose the contour widens and transitions towards the engine nascelles. It is here the coke bottle design is clearly visible.

Please be sure to read an about the evolution of the Flying & Blended Wings in the two part series here. http://theaviationevangelist.com/2025/09/13/the-evolution-of-the-flying-wing-part-one/

The windshield of the XB-70 in flight with the side windows. The second picture shows the XB-70 from 1964, the waisting clearly visible.

The XB-70 used a retractable windshield ( the first of its kind). The windshield serviced multiple purposes. The first was to create a clear aerodynamic line. The second was heat insulation for the cockpit at 600 degrees F (it did heavily restrict forward visibility). To augment visibility, the canopy had flat, heat shielded windows on the sides. Aircraft such as the Concorde and TU-144 followed a similar concept with their droop noses.

The Wings 

The large & thin wing area with a high aspect ratio ( the wingspan divided by the mean distance between the leading & trailing edges of the wing a.k.a average chord) managed sub / transonic lift (aerodynamic lift). 

The sculpted leading edges of the wing helped control vortices the delta wings generated. Vortex lift is important during high angles of attack (specific to delta wings) during take off and landing. Concorde is a famous example of using vortex lift.

A front view of the XB-70 clearly showing the sculpted leading edges and some elevations raised.

The flat undersurface of not just the wings but also engines ‘6 pack’ was critical to the XB-70’s most important design feature, ‘ Compression Lift’. The wings outer panels ( last twenty of the trailing edge on each side ) drooped by up to 65 degrees. The droop was important to trap the shock waves created off the sculpted engine intake splitter & the intakes themselves.

The sculpted inlet , the vertical splitter being the prominent feature. The second picture shows the six pack and the flat underbody of the aircraft enabling shockwaves to be trapped under the aircraft with the drooping wings.

While most of us think of shockwaves coming off a supersonic aircraft horizontally, the splitter was responsible for generating shockwaves vertically, these waves being trapped by the folded wingtips creating a wave cushion. The XB-70 generated up to 30% of required supersonic lift through compression lift. Shock waves would bounce into the engine inlets too. The folded wingtips improved yaw handling a great deal and the XB-70 needed much smaller vertical stabilizers as a result.

The XB-70 is the first aircraft to use three different kinds of lift across the speed regime. The swept back wings at 65 degrees reduced transonic drag and improved handling. 

The wings flexed and bent considerably through the speed regime. To help keep the wing flexible the engineers at NAA intuitively integrated six elevons (combination flaps & airelons) on each wing and avoided binding the wing. Furthermore by doing so they managed extreme hinge and actuator loads inflight (hinge moments).

Detailed schematics of the XB-70 showing the crew capsule (top picture top left corner ) and elevons (both pictures).

The six elevon setup gave the FACS more flexibility as it managed pitch / trim (inboard elevons) and roll (outboard elevon). As the wingtips drooped (25 – 65 degrees) the two outboard elevons were faired to zero and became part of the folding wingtip. Lastly, having six elevons helped with redundancy. All hydraulics on the aircraft were at 4,000 psi.

AV1 had a flat wing with zero degree dihedral, while AV2 had a five degree dihedral as a design refinement. This gave AV2 better directional and roll stability over AV1 and also gave AV2 better compression lift efficiency. 

AV2 was unfortunately lost on June 8 , 1966 during a formation photo flight. General Electric had a photo session using the XB-70, F-104 Starfighter, F-4 Phantom II & a T-38 Talon. All of them used GE engines.

Test pilot Joe Walker (the most experienced supersonic pilot then) in his F-104 was sucked into the starboard wingtip turbulence of the XB-70, flipped over the vertical stabilizers of the XB-70 and crashed in a fireball. The doomed XB-70 flew level for a few seconds before going into a steep spiral and crashing, taking with it co-pilot Carl Cross. Pilot Al white ejected using the crew escape capsule engineed for high altitude ejection or depressurisation while retaining control of the aircraft (in event of depressurization).

The Engine Nascelles & Intakes

The engine nacelles not only fed the engines with air but also were an integral part of the compression lift generated by the XB-70.

The entry was split by a vertical splitter fins. The engines were split three on each side. They also projected the airflow towards the drooped wing tips to trap shockwaves. The nacelles created oblique shock waves at the inlet lips as they began slowing air to about 400 mph from supersonic speeds as stable air was directed to the engines. This kept engine compressor pressure within a constant bandwidth. The trailing edges of the three moveable ramps behind the engine inlets hinged inwards or outwards (between 10 – 30 degrees or upto one foot) as per the Mach number and compressor requirement. The entire system including the ramp angles & bleed doors (for excess air) was continuously adjusted by the inlet control system. 

The inlet detailed schematic .

The engine nacelle had a 2D rectangular configuration and had a maximum height of 4 feet. The length of the intake from the nacelle to the engines was approx 30 feet.

A front view showing the engine inlet and splitter in detail
Rare pictures of the inside of the intakes at different depths inside the 30 foot intake .

The underside of the entire intake ramp was flat as it aided in compression lift.

The Engines a.k.a ‘The Six Pack’

The XB-70 had six General Electric ( GE) YJ93-GE-3 turbojet engines.

Each axial flow engine generated 19,900 pounds of dry thrust and 28,800 pounds with afterburners. The engines had no thrust reversers and used drogue chutes as a stopping device. With eleven compressor stages and of which six were low pressure and five high pressure.

The engines were made of Nickel based alloys and stainless steel. Advanced blade cooling allowed the engine to survive high exhaust gas temperatures (EGT). The engines used high flash point JP-6 fuel.

The engine control system synchronised with automatic inlet control management to prevent compressor stalls and upstarts (happens when airflow to engines is unstable due rapid speed changes).

With so many different systems working in tandem on such a precision piece of engineering the YJ93 was a high maintenance product.

The Landing Gear

The XB-70 had the conventional hydraulic tricycle gear. 

The rearward folding nosewheel had two wheels.

The nose landing gear.

The main gear had two bogies with four wheels each. The main gear had a complex mechanism of folding the bogie in, then a twist and then folding into the wheel wells. The wells had a flap that closed and aerodynamically sealed the wheels inside.

The main gear each had one small wheel between the outer pair of wheels. This small wheel acted as a braking sensor was an early ABS mechanism. During rejected takeoffs the brakes could heat up to 1,000 degree F.

The main landing gear.

The landing gear struts were made of forged chromium-molybdenum steel for its exceptional strength and fatigue resistance. The struts were more than capable of handling the 500,000 pound gross weight during heavy landings at over 200 knots.

The tyres were made by Goodyear and had aluminium woven into them to withstand the high landing temperatures of over 300 degrees F. Each tire was Nitrogen inflated to over 250 psi.

The XB-70s brakes had a multiple disc setup. Each disc is made of forged steel. They were heat treated to resist warping and cracking under extreme thermal loads.

The Fuel System

The aircraft carried approximately 43 – 46,000 gallons of JP-6 Fuel. Everything about the system was about managing heat, aircraft stability & structural integrity in addition to feeding the engines optimally across the speed range.

Fuel was stored across eleven fuel tanks distributed across the fuselage and wings of the aircraft. The tanks themselves were constructed using the same honeycomb sandwich panels used for the fuselage skin. The honeycombing did throw up sealing issues which was resolved using advanced epoxy compounds. Although some tanks never properly sealed and hence were never used (ex: the tail tank).

Using the JP-6 fuel as a coolant was a first ! The fuel was circulated through ten heat exchangers throughout the aircraft to absorb and dissipate heat. The heat exchangers were part of the engines fuel pumping system enroute to ignition.

The tanks themselves had heatsinks within each of them to draw excess heat. Furthermore to prevent vapor ignition the tanks were inerted using 700 pounds of liquid nitrogen held in dedicated tanks. As fuel was consumed nitrogen filled the empty tanks to maintain pressure, displace oxygen and reduce fire risk at elevated temperatures.

The fuel management system was integral to the Centre of Gravity Management system. The system actively transferred fuel between tanks as Mach numbers increased. As speed increases the aerodynamic centre of the aircraft moves rearward. The centre of gravity needs to coincide with this to avoid a Mach Tuck. By drooping the outer wingtips in conjunction with its canards, the aircraft effectively moved the centre of pressure forward. The fuel management system worked in conjunction with the compression lift mechanism by moving fuel forward to balance the rearward move of the aerodynamic centre. The wing tanks were typically burned off first. 

We observe here that all systems were dependent on each other to maintain stability.

Lastly the JP-6 fuel was specifically developed for the XB-70 program and its extreme speed regime. It addressed the issues of aerodynamic heating, high speed engine performance and safety & high altitude operation. The fuel performance exceeded all the XB-70 operating parameters and was developed as an alternative to zip fuels (high calorific value boron based fuels). Zip fuels had caustic byproducts that caused engine wear and posed toxicity risks.

Kerosene based JP-6 was the safe alternative that provided for all requirements without the byproducts. 

The Materials of the XB-70

Over ninety percent of the external structure of the XB-70 ( fuselage skin, nacelles ) was made of type 321 stainless steel built as a honeycomb structure. The material and construction had high thermal resistance of up to 600 degrees F with minimal distortion at Mach 3. The structure itself was rigid, lightweight and thermally stable.

The Honeycomb panels used on the XB-70.

The hot areas such as engine bays & aft of bays & internal structure was made of a titanium alloy called Ti-6Al-4V also known as Grade 5 titanium. The alloy was 90% titanium, 6% aluminium, 4% vanadium and had excellent thermal resistance of over 1000 degrees F with an excellent strength to weight ratio.

High temperature adhesives used to bond the honeycomb structure were made of redux and epoxy adhesives. The honeycomb structure could not be riveted as it would weaken the structure.

Non heat zones such as avionics bays, hydraulic lines & non load bearing fuselage sections were made of aluminium alloys as they were light weight, easy to machine and cooler.

The engine and exhaust area materials were made of Inconel & Rene 41. These alloys can resist very high EGTs in the range of 1,800 degrees F.

All coatings and sealants had heat resistant coatings to prevent oxidation and surface degradation due high temperatures. The sealants protected the honeycomb edges from moisture intrusion & thermal cycling damage.

Strategic Bomber to Experimental Research Platform 

By the late 1950s the US & Soviet SAMs were getting bigger, faster and more powerful. President Eisenhower was a proponent of the ICBMs (Inter Continental Ballistic Missiles). His take on the XB-70 program was that “ building the XB-70 was like fighting with bows & arrows in the era of gunpowder and guns” The XB-70 just could not cope with the banks of Soviet SAM systems coming online across the entire USSR. 

Gary Powers was shot down in a U2 over the USSR at 70,400 feet and this would prove President Eisenhower’s prophecy.

The program was cancelled in 1959, however to salvage the considerable expenditure already incurred (over $300 mn) the Pentagon authorized the production of a single vehicle. AV1 was almost completely handbuilt.

Pic 1 shows the XB-70 with flaked off paint after a supersonic run. The second picture shows the XB-70 with the A-12 Oxcart.

The XB-70 program is a great example of how politics directs expenditure. As the political tug of war continued NAA was caught in the middle of a fierce battle. The Air Force continued to support the program and even attempted to reinstate it as a combat test vehicle.

The 1960 election of President Kennedy brought fresh impetus to a failing program, the President switched the program from a manned bomber to an experimental aircraft. A total of three were to be constructed, however only two were ever completed, the third was incomplete (the avionics and other systems were actually ready).

NAA should be commended for sticking through the program at each step. Finally there was consensus across all stakeholders including the Air Force, Politicians, NASA & of course NAA.

The XB-70 in the Air

Total flights – 129

AV1 – total flights83
Total flight time – 160hrs 16min

Mach 3 flights – 1. 

AV1 had several design issues that restricted speed to Mach 2.5

AV2 – total flights 46

Total flight time – 92hrs 22min

Mach 3 flights – 9

On May 19, 1966 AV2 flew at Mach 3 for 32 consecutive minutes.

Combined, the XB-70 Valkyrie accumulated a total of 1hr 48min at Mach 3+.

Each flight of the XB-70 was an adventure and there were several incidents.

The Legacy of the XB-70 Valkyrie

The XB-70 was an aircraft of many firsts, later adopted for use by the Aviation / Aerospace Industry. Below are listed a few of them!

  • Variable geometry wings later adopted by aircraft such as the B-1A/B Lancer. Compression lift later used by the SR-71. The overall aerodynamic stability of XB-70 influenced several other projects.
  • Material and thermal management solutions advanced the development of heat-resistant structures and cooling systems, impacting aerospace exploration technologies.
  • Fuel and propulsion innovations directly contributed to the SR-71 and indirectly to modern jet engines and fuel systems, particularly for high-speed and high-altitude operations. 
  • Avionics and automation laid groundwork for modern flight control and safety systems, enhancing reliability and reducing pilot workload in complex aircraft .
  • The XB-70’s strategic obsolescence redirected military aviation toward low-altitude and stealth technologies, while its test data shaped research and development for decades

Epilogue 

Over 50 years after her last flight in 1969 the XB-70 at the National Museum of the United States Airforce, looks ready to take off and fly away to the clouds where she belongs. Makes you wonder what she would have been like in the air? A combination of size, speed, sound ,smoke & incredible power all coming together creating a show like none other.

Perhaps the Valkyrie’s greatest message to future generations is ‘ Always be innovating, it’s the only path forward’.

The XB-70 says good bye as she accelerates to Mach speed with her wingtips down to 65 degrees….

Credit for all pictures to the respective owners.

Please be sure to read about the Flying & Blended Wings, a two part series here. http://theaviationevangelist.com/2025/09/13/the-evolution-of-the-flying-wing-part-one/

For more deep dive easy to read articles please go to https://theaviationevangelist.com do keep scrolling down, and do share

Follow me:

LinkedIn : https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-aviation-evangelist/

X : @ManiRayaprolu

Reddit : r/theaviationevangelist

Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61583497868441#

https://www.instagram.com/theaviationevangelist?igsh=ZjA5YXI3MWd3OGZs&utm_source=qr

SAMs , Satellites & Unseen Speed

The very first SAMs were the German V2’s from WW2. While their value was being understood they still had a long way to go as on the range & accuracy parameters.

The US began developing its missiles from the late 40s onwards and by the mid 50s had batteries of Nike Ajax missiles to guard against Soviet bomber attacks. By 1955 the Soviets themselves had the S-25 Berkut system and the famous S-75 Dvina came into being by 1957 having range, speed & accuracy.

The Soviet Sputnik launch of 1957 started off a whole new Cold War race and it was dominance from space. However satellites were still in their infancy and the CORONA & GAMBIT missions were still between 5 and 10 years away. Missile technology had a head start over satellite tech.

By 1956 the recently released U-2, Dragon Lady was already being painted regularly by Soviet defense systems, however the U2’s cruising altitude of 70,000 feet was still thought to be out of range of Soviet missile systems, even at its subsonic speed. Gary Power’s being shot down in 1960 only reinforced the need for speed, altitude and agility, the need for a Blackbird (which was already in development).

However even before the 1960 incident a fresh thought went through the US Armed services and it was speed. The recently launched B-58 Hustler had shown that Mach 2 was possible (if a little dangerous) and the various wings of the armed forces and CIA began to look at Mach 3 as the speed benchmark, stealth was not yet in the picture.

The WS-110A or what would become the XB-70 Bomber already underway was in trouble even before it got off the ground as it was believed Soviet SAMs could take down a large bomber with no stealth capabilities, the XB-70 would become an experimental aircraft as an attempt to just their cost of over $1.5 Bn for two vehicles or $750 Mn a pop! (Read here about the XB-70)

(https://theaviationevangelist.com/2025/10/10/xb-70-valkyrie-the-grand-daddy-of-supersonic/ ).

At around the same time and in parallel to the XB-70 program the CIA went to Lockheed to develop a Mach 3 capable reconnaissance aircraft that flew at over 90,000 feet (considered untouchable by SAMs) and would be difficult to detect by Radar. Lockheed with previous experience developing the U2 Dragon lady which had a service ceiling of 70,000 feet albeit at subsonic speed looked the right outfit to build such a plane.

This is the story of the Blackbird Family of aircraft and it all started with the A-12 Oxcart, an ironic name considering the A-12 was the exact opposite of an Oxcart.

A pencil sketch of the Blackbird by my Daughter from a few years ago. Hung in my office.

Project Archangel

In Apr ’58 Kelly Johnson the legendary head of Skunk Works said ‘ I recall having long discussions with (CIA Deputy Director for Plans) Richard M. Bissell Jr. over the subject of whether there should be a follow-on to the U-2 aircraft. We agreed … that there should be one more round before satellites would make aircraft reconnaissance obsolete for covert reconnaissance ‘. 

The CIA’s hunt for a U-2 successor  was called Project Gusto and by 1958 the two finalists were Convair with their Kingfish and Lockheed with their Archangel. Convair’s Kingfish had a lower cross section than Lockheed’s A-3 concept. Both companies were asked to refine their designs and here is where Lockheed pulled into the lead.

The A-11 that would be modified to become the A-12. Pic Source : Wikipedia

Following the A-3, (the A stands for Archangel) Lockheed’s iterations A-4 to A-6 used Blended Body Fuselage (BSF) designs along with turboramjet (more on this later) & rocket propellant, but they fell well short of the range requirements. Iterations A-7 to A-9 used a single J58 engine (just the turbojet) with two Marquat XPJ-59 Ramjets that used J-150 fuel, a highly classified type of fuel the JP stands for Jet Propellent and was expected to improve range, however still well short. The A-10 used two GE J93 turbojets (same as the XB-70 Valkyrie)  with underwing inlets for better range, however the iterations continued to fly short of the required parameters. Iterations on the A-11 Lockheed added twin inward canted fins that were angled inwards at 15° made of composite materials, other leading edge surfaces featured composites as well, together the improvements went a long way towards improving RCS ( Radar Cross Section) of the aircraft. To add to these design improvements  the wings were extended through chines that went right upto the cockpit and the bottom of the aircraft flattened with the wings blended into the fuselage, the improvements won Lockheed a $96.6 Mn contract to construct a dozen A-12s. The dozen airframes would extend to 18 if you include the three airframes used for the YF-12 , one trainer and two M-21 aircraft. Project Archangel / A-12 was underway.

The A-12 design: Pic Source : Wikipedia

The J-58 Engine

While the A-12 was an amazing aircraft design that is yet to be replicated almost 70 years on, it is the insane engineering that went into the engines of the aircraft that needs to be spoken of first.

The J-58 Turboramjet!

The external dimensions of the engine were a length of 17.10’ a diameter of 4.9’ and weight of 6,000 pounds might feel puny by today’s standards, the engineering that went into them is unique.Pratt & Whitney JT-11 Mach 3+ jet engine (J58) . (strongly recommend a watch). The engine generated 30,000 pounds of thrust with afterburners and had 8 compressor stages.Pratt & Whitney J58 (JT11D-20) Turbojet Engine | National Air and Space Museum

Sometime between 1956-58 the US Navy approached P&W to develop a Mach 3 capable engine for their planned Martin P6M Jet Seaplane. P&W had begun testing their prototype when the Navy realized the costs involved did not justify an aircraft when their main weapons were ships, submarines & missiles. The Navy pulled out by 1958ish. The CIA, which already had Lockheed in advanced design stages of their project Archangel/A-12 had obviously heard of this engineering marvel and approached P&W to continue development on the J-58…and the rest is history.

The J-58 engine. Note the three pipes heading towards the afterburner. The plate right upfront on the side is the hydraulic computer. Pic Source : Air & Space

Coming back to the turboramjet, a couple of definitions. 

Turbojet definition : In a turbojet all the air that goes in the front is sent through the compression stages, fired up in the combustion chamber and the resulting exhaust gases generate thrust.

Ramjet definition : A ramjet is a type of engine that uses the forward motion of the aircraft to compress air and fire it up. Such an engine has no moving parts and aircraft using such engines need to be launched off another transport aircraft generally.

So why did the J-58 need both?

The J-58 was optimized for Mach 3.2 cruise and such high speed generates heat in the excess of 750°F which would melt the internals of the J-58 turbojet. A solution was required and here lies the engine’s unique feature, the frontal spike and six tubes running (three on each side) from the stage four compressor straight back to the afterburner section (a type of bypass).

The J-58’s variable geometry spike is where over 50% of the engine’s thrust is generated, but first another bit of information. At Mach 3.2 the compression at the engine’s inlet was almost as high as the thrust generated out the back, the engine would be in a neutral state of thrust, and in some cases negative (this is where the inlet management is critical). The pressure recovery on the J-58 is at 88% showing it is highly efficient at Mach 3.2.

The spike moves front and back by 26”. Right up to Mach 1.6 the spike stays in the full front position and the engine operates as a normal turbojet. At Mach 1.6 the engine begins moving back 1.6” for every increase in speed by Mach 0.1. The spike itself moves backwards into a conical receptacle and the backward movement of 1.6” for Mach 0.1 increase in speed maintains the ‘normal’ just behind the throat of the spike receptacle. The normal is the point where dynamic pressure switches to static pressure, and the movement of the normal is carefully calibrated by the spike to maintain optimal thrust across the speed Mach 1.6 – Mach 3.2 range.

At approx Mach 2.2 sensors detect that airflow and temperature are right to begin turboramjet operation by opening up the compressor bleed bypass valves, these valves are placed at the fourth compressor stage, and direct ram air through the tubes direct to the afterburners. The air is approx 400°F and helps keep the combustion chamber and turbines relatively cooler and within thermal limits. The afterburner fires more efficiently as a result of the cooler air.

A schematic showing the various engine regimes. Pic Source: Wikipedia

At Mach 3.2 the engine’s spike aligns the shockwave with the engine’s nacelle perfectly. The engine has a series of doors that maintain optimal pressure through the entire length. The cowl bleed doors is a porous strip on the inlet’s inner surface, the purpose is to bleed off excess boundary layer air and prevent an unstart at high speed.  Further back the engine has suck in doors, these doors open up at low speeds (below Mach 0.5) such as the beginning of a take off roll to feed the engine with more air and aid low speed thrust generation. Furthermore at low speeds right at the afterburners are tertiary doors that automatically open and close as per ambient pressure relative to the exhaust gases, these doors let in additional air as required. The spike itself has a porous strip that manages slow moving boundary layer air. At low speeds the engines are extremely air hungry and this creates a low pressure area at the engine nacelle, the strip pulls in the air into the centre body and vents it out through centre bleed louvres. The air reverses direction at approx Mach 1.5 the air inside the spike centrebody duct reverses. 

There is a story of a SR-71 pilot who decided to speed check his bird and got up to Mach 3.4 before he swallowed his own shockwave, flaming out both engines at 80,000 feet! He recovered one at 65,000 feet and the other at 25,000 feet. There was of course a discreet rap on the knuckles!! This story does highlight the fine balance within the engine and how it was optimized for Mach 3.2.

A look at the engine shows a tremendous amount of plumbing, not all of it is air, oil or fuel!. On each side of the engine nacelle is a hydraulic computer, yes hydraulic! The plumbing you observe is the computers optimizing engine operation. One of the computers is to manage the afterburner and the other is for the engine. The J-58s were created when computers were in their infancy and a solid state system was required that could withstand high temperatures and work optimally, hydraulic computers were the option.

The operating temperatures expand the engine by 6” in length and 2.5” in diameter and this sort of expansion and contraction needs exotic metals. The very front of the engine at the nacelle is titanium, the rest of the engine is made of iron nickel alloys such as Waspalloy, Inconel & Astrology. All the metal in the engine is directionally solidified so the metal expansion is directional and can be managed. The plumbing on the engine is made of steel 321 and 347 and there are over 600 pieces of plumbing on the engine.

The oil used in the engine is synthetic, made of polyphenyl ether and is stable at 650°F. The oil is maintained at 400°F by routing through a fuel oil cooler, a heat exchanger where the oil contacts with the cooler fuel heating it up and cooling itself before the fuel is routed into the engine.

The complex system was started by two V8 Buick Hellcat motors which were a petrolhead’s delight, apparently the crew blew through most of the Buick motors that salvage yards across the United States had with them. The two motors would spool up to 6000 rpm and the crank interfaced with a gearbox at the bottom of the engine and needed to retract as the aircraft engines got to 3000 rpm, the J58s fired up at 4000. The crew got so carried away with revving the Hellcats that they delayed retraction blowing their engines up! Once the Hellcat stock was run through the crew moved to Chevy 454 cu.in engines, but they were not the same.

At Mach 3.2 over 50% of the engine’s thrust was created at the inlet and an additional 28% at the afterburner. This left just about 20% of thrust needed from the turbojet! While the first A-12s flew with less effective J-75 engines, once they cutover by 1963-64 to the J-58, the blackbirds never went back to anything else.

The Design

The external dimensions of the A-12 Oxcart (the foundational Blackbird) was a length of 101.7’, wingspan of 55.7’ and a height of 18.6’. The MTOW of the aircraft was 124,600 pounds.

A front view of the aircraft showed off a flattish underbelly with blended in wings at the fuselage. A sharp angular cockpit at the very front and twin tail canted in at 15° each. The flow of the wing’s leading edge was interrupted by heavily integrated engines on each wing right in the centre.

A front view of the SR-71 note the canted fins, the flattish underbelly and the blended wing fuselage. Pic Source: Reddit User

The nose of the A-12 looks more conventional than the Blackbirds that followed. While it slopes up towards the angular cockpit windows in a more or less conical manner, the bottom is more flattened to merge with the rest of the flattish underbelly. This sort of contouring is necessary to manage shockwaves and keep the aircraft aerodynamically optimized.

While Blended Wing Bodies have existed since the early days of flight, they had never been used practically. The blackbirds are not traditional BWBs (as we know them since the 1990s) in the new sense they are what is called a Blended Wing Fuselage. Read here (https://theaviationevangelist.com/2025/09/19/the-flying-wing-part-two-the-blended-wing-body/ ).

The chines that begin on each side of the cockpit at a sharp angle of approx 70-80° and swept back towards the delta wing were an integral part of the BWF serving multiple functions. The first was stealth (yes the A-12 is the very first purpose built stealth aircraft https://theaviationevangelist.com/2025/10/22/the-theory-of-stealth/ ). The specially designed edges with their composite materials reflected radar waves away from the source and reduced the aircraft’s RCS to about 10m2 or a largish bird, a big improvement of over 90% over the RCS signatures of preceding aircraft Reducing the A-12 Blackbird’s Cross Section. The second purpose was the chines served had a critical to the aerodynamics of the aircraft and that was to generate lift. They worked to generate approx 17-20% of total aircraft lift in two ways. The first was the creation of vortices over the chines, inner wing and fuselage, delta wings with a sharp leading edge sweep, at high Angles of Attack (AoA) rely on vortex lift . The second is the blended and flattish underbelly works as a lifting body and contributes towards the 17-20% lift. This means the load is off the wings and more evenly distributed which is critical at high Mach numbers. The reason the chines were terminated at the cockpit i.s.o going right to the nose like the SR-71 was the A-12 was a single pilot aircraft and the chines terminating at the cockpit saved weight and were optimized for higher speeds at altitudes of up to 95,000 feet.

The chines blended into a delta wing with a leading edge sweep angle of 60°. The edge of the wing was interrupted in the middle by the engine nacelle.Close observation of the leading edge and the engine shows up a gap on both sides of the engine, this was to accommodate the 2.5” expansion of the diameter of the engine and boundary layer control. On the trailing edge the gap is more pronounced as this was the business end of the engine with the hot exhaust gases. Other than this the wing was fairly standard in the front view profile! A top view of the wing shows a second chime that comes off the outboard engine cowling on both wings blending back into the leading edge, these chines increase the aspect ratio of the swept back delta improving lift.

The trailing edges of each wing had a pair of elevons, one inboard and one outboard of the engine. In tailless delta wings the elevons serve the purpose of the elevators and ailerons. When they move together they control pitch and when they work opposite to each other, they control roll on the aircraft.

Further back is a pair of twin fins each canted in 15° as mentioned earlier, the canting is part of the aircraft’s stealth and the original fins were made of composite (because of they non reflective properties), however most of the aircraft in the entire Blackbird fleet used titanium fins with composite accents.

The entire Blackbird was a flying fuel tank. Fuel was stored in six tanks throughout the body and wings including the chines. The fuel was burned in a specific sequence as the center gravity moved significantly rearwards at higher speed numbers. The Blackbirds famously had wet wings. That is the skin of the wings and body of the aircraft was the fuel tank itself. In the interests of saving weight and the fact the titanium skin of the aircraft was heat resistant, the fuel was stored directly. The thermal expansion in flight meant the panels had gaps on ground and there were thresholds by area of the aircraft as to the number of fuel drops falling per minute that was acceptable. The same gaps sealed in the air as the metal expanded.

Acceptable fuel leak range by zone of the aircraft. Pic Source : Reddit User

The aircraft had a tricycle landing with the main gear having three wheels in parallel. The main nose gear had a single two wheel bogie. The Goodrich tires were infused with aluminium for thermal resistance and were inflated with nitrogen, a non combustible inert gas for safety.

Most of the aircraft was constructed of titanium because of its thermal resistance, however titanium is extremely hard to work with and a specialized set of rigs and tools had to be created to work with the metal. At the time the Blackbirds were being constructed the Soviet Union was the largest exporter of titanium and the CIA procured the required titanium through a series of shell companies making the final buyers (the CIA) untraceable.

The wings of the aircraft had corrugation on the top and bottom prompting jokes that Kelly Johnson was building a Mach 3 Ford Trimotor (an early airliner). The corrugation was to aid thermal dissipation and while there was a drag penalty at lower speeds which was powered through, at Mach 3 and over 80,000 feet the drag was minimal.

The aircraft was painted black with iron ball paint. The paint helps with stealth by converting radar waves to heat and dissipating it. Furthermore according to Kirchoof’s Law of Thermal radiation a good absorber of thermal radiation is also a good emitter, means that the black iron ball paint is the right color to repel heat by emitting it!

With a first flight in April 1962 the A-12 quickly demonstrated its capabilities even with the less capable J-75 engines. The USAF which was initially part of project GUSTO quickly realized this was an aircraft that was the answer to its need for a high speed aircraft. They put out the requirements for RS-71 (Reconnaissance Strike) by approx 1963, it was President Johnson who called the aircraft SR-71 erroneously and the name stuck. Furthermore the A-12 needed to be kept classified (which it was until 1990) and the USAF’s requirements for a high speed aircraft made a great cover story in 1964 when the SR-71 and YF-12 projects were announced. The M-21 Tagboard was never officially announced during its active life. TheYF-12 and the M-21 aircraft had approx same dimensions as the A-12 Oxcart while the SR-71 was longer and bigger. The M-21 aircraft had a pylon on top between the two fins to fit a D-21 drone on it. Of the two prototypes built, one crashed in 1966 when the the D-21 drone collided with the fins after separating, the plane crashed while the pilot survived, the M-21 was cancelled immediately after this and the surviving prototype is at the Museum of Flight in Seattle. Lockheed M-21 (Blackbird) | The Museum of Flight .

The M-21 with the D-21 drone. Pic Source : Wikipedia

The YF-12 took spots 7-9 on the A-12 Oxcart assembly line and was a Mach 3 interceptor prototype. It was to be a replacement to the F-106 Delta Dart, however severe cost cuts in view of the Vietnam War resulted in the program being scrapped. The main modifications was cutting the A-12’s nose chines to accommodate radar and infrared tracking equipment. The chines of the YF-12 show a clear indentation. Today of the three aircraft constructed only one survives at the USAF Museum in Dayton Ohio, it flew with NASA until 1979 after the YF-12 program was cancelled in 1967.

The YF-12 Interceptor. Note the truncated chines. Pic Source: Wikipedia
The YF-12 with modified chines to accommodate the radar equipment. Pic Source : Wikipedia

The Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird is a fairy tale of an aircraft, it has been immortalized in movies, books, articles like this and forum across social media with a huge fan following even 60 years after its first flight. Where the A-12 was heavily classified decades after its operation, the SR-71 was heavily publicized (to cover the A-12) and this is why the SR-71 is considered the most famous of the Blackbirds. Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird | Military Wiki

The SR-71 was to have a two man crew as against the A-12 single pilot. And where the A-12 carried a high resolution camera system the SR-71 carried a sensor array that included Side Looking Radar (SLR) and Electronic Intelligence Systems (ELINT). Where the A-12 was about covert photography for the CIA (the aircraft was disguised in USAF markings) the SR-71 was more about strategic reconnaissance (SR) for the USAF. To accommodate the radar installations, the chines were extended to the nose in the manner we know so well. The chine extensions on the SR-71 had the same lifting and stealth properties of the A-12, where lifting contribution remained at the same 17-20% as the A-12, the RCS was slightly higher than the A-12 but not by much (it was the larger bulk).

In case you are wondering why the A-12 on the USS Intrepid has the chines right to the nose tip, it’s because it was used as a radar object when understanding the stealth characteristics of the SR-71.

A front view of the A-12 at the USS Intrepid. Pic Source: Wikipedia

The SR-71 was longer than the A-12 by six feet to accommodate the second crew member and had a length of 107.5’. The wingspan and height of the aircraft was identical to the A-12.The dry weight of the aircraft was 6 tons heavier than the A-12 and MTOW was 22 tons heavier than the A-12. The additional bulk and mass made the SR-71 slower than the A-12 whose max speed was Mach 3.35 vs the SR-71s Mach 3.2. The SR-71s service ceiling was 85,000 feet vs the A-12s 95,000 feet. The range of SR-71 was 3250 miles vs the A-12s range at 2500 miles.When we see a comparison of the numbers we realize the A-12 Oxcart is just not celebrated enough.

Project Nice Girl

Project Nice Girl was the face off between the A-12 & the SR-71. The costs of running multiple high cost projects for the various services was getting out of control and in the autumn of 1967 the A-12 & the SR-71 had a play off. While the A-12 had superior speed and altitude , it was hampered by cloud cover during the fly off and the high resolution panoramic cameras on the A-12 were beaten by the SR-71s sensors that could peer past the clouds and collect valuable accurate data. The dividing factor was beating the weather and the A-12 was retired in 1968, the project was only declassified in 1990 and the aircraft handed over to museums across the United States.

Summation

As satellites got better and were in a position to take over from the considerable duties the SR-71, the amazing bird saw its days numbered. Additionally astronomical sosts of keeping the birds in the air just did not make sense to keep them flying and the decision was taken to retire the program.

Over sixty years after it first flew the SR-71 and the Blackbird Family of Aircraft continue to inspire awe, several of the projects they were involved in continue to be classified and this is what contributes to their enduring legacy. Their speed and altitude records intact over 35 years after the last flight of a Blackbird.

The peak of innovation… 

Before you Leave.

Read More Amazing Content at: https://theaviationevangelist.com keep scrolling down.

Follow me:

LinkedIn : https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-aviation-evangelist/

X : @ManiRayaprolu

Reddit : r/theaviationevangelist

Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61583497868441#

https://www.instagram.com/theaviationevangelist?igsh=ZjA5YXI3MWd3OGZs&utm_source=qr

Social Media continues to be flooded with images, stories and statistics about the Concorde, a troubled engineering marvel that retired in 2003. The ‘Concorde’ feed highlights the love and awe the aircraft inspired. The retirement had a sense of finality about it, like a curtain being drawn, not on just the Concorde but on Supersonic Travel itself, the reason being the issues were not about the aircraft but about the accompanying noise pollution at take off ,landing and the shadow called the sonic boom.

Boom Supersonic a startup founded in 2014, but birthed in the mind at least 2-3 years prior decided to do something about. Their CEO Blake Scholl decided he was going to make a supersonic aircraft that not only went supersonic , but was quiet and without an accompanying sonic boom over land. This is the story of The Overture and is part three of the QueSST series which you can read here. https://theaviationevangelist.com/2025/10/09/the-boom-xb-1-the-little-plane-that-could/ & https://theaviationevangelist.com/2025/11/04/the-lockheed-x-59-quesst-pinocchio-swordfish/

The Overture First Iteration

The first iteration of the Overture was unveiled in Nov 2016 along with the first iteration of the XB-1 the one third scale technological demonstrator of the Overture, and both of them looked extremely similar to what the Concorde looked like! The difference being the technologies available in 2016 vs 1969 when the Concorde first flew.

Overcoming the laws of physics means any supersonic aircraft needs to be shaped a certain way, and this is where the Concorde design was lightyears ahead of its time. Concorde was the only successful supersonic jet and it made sense to look at the Concorde baseline, the original Overture was to be a trijet as was the original XB-1.

By 2018 the XB-1 subscale model was ready for wind tunnel tests and the first set of tests confirmed the predicted aerodynamic calibrations that were arrived at through CFD was off by 30%. Such a difference keeps magnifying as it goes up in scale to the full sized Overture. The Team at Boom had to go back to the drawing boards after almost 4 years of work and rework the design of the XB-1 which in turn would impact the Overture.

The very first iteration of the the Overture & XB-1 : Pic Source : The Independent

Repeated finetuning of the design resulted in the XB-1 that broke the sound barrier in early 2025 with no apparent sonic boom (uses a concept called Mach Cutoff), the jet itself was still in a trijet configuration but looked considerably different from the original when it rolled out on Oct 7,2020.

The tests (both CFD & wind tunnel) highlighted the design on the final XB-1 was not scalable to the Overture and there would have to be a complete rework on the fuselage, wings and engines of the Overture. Some of the highlighted issues were high take off and landing speeds due to the very low aspect ratio on the reworked XB-1’s wing, the very high angle of attack that Boom addressed with an augmented reality system, a trijet would not produce enough thrust practically to push the bigger Overture to supersonic.

In July 2022 Boom unveiled its significantly reworked Overture. The unveiling was done after considerable CFD testing followed by wind tunnel testing across five locations in the USA & Europe covering various flight regimes.The fuselage and wings looked extremely sculpted and the aircraft featured four underwing podded engines instead of the original three.

The Design

At transonic speeds (Mach 0.8-1.2) local air flows accelerate over and around the aircraft fuselage and wings can reach the speed of sound. The minimum speed at which this occurs varies from aircraft to aircraft and is known as critical Mach number. The shockwaves formed at these localized zones cause a sudden increase in drag is called wave drag. To mitigate the strength and number of shockwaves an aircraft’s cross sectional area needs to transition smoothly from front to rear. This is known as Whitcomb Area Rule of 1952 .The phenomenon was observed in various forms by multiple aerodynamicists before Whitcomb.

In the case of the Concorde the area rule was applied at Mach 2 and the rear fuselage was extended by 12.2’ on the production aircraft over the prototype and reduced wave drag by 1.8%. A similar concept was applied to the first iteration of the Overture and XB-1, the results we have already spoken of. The final iteration of the Overture extensively uses the area rule to maximum effect.

The external specs of the Boom Overture are a length of 201 feet ,a wing span of 106 feet and a height of 36 feet. The interior cabin is expected to be 79 feet in length with an aisle height of 6.5 feet, good enough for a tall person to walk through at full height. It will be capable of Maxh 1.7 at 60,000 feet cruising altitude and a max range of 4.250 NM approx 350NM more than the Concorde. https://apnews.com/press-release/pr-newswire/technology-airlines-climate-and-environment-7e88c34a01a4194c6f1e6b4760d2bb86

A front view of the nose is the first observation of the rule. Where subsonic aircraft bodies in general are circular to oblong in appearance the Overture’s nose and body behind has a distinct oval shape (left ↔️right) like an egg starting from a singular point the tip of the nose. Much like the final XB-1 the nose slopes upwards at a much higher angle from the nose tip than the bottom, like a cone that has been pushed down flattening the bottom. The oval shape of the nose permits the cabin to have the maximum permissible height allowing for passenger comfort as they walk through the aisle while at the same time minimizing aircraft front on cross section. The reason for the differing angles top and bottom of the nose tip is to control shockwaves. One of the main lessons learnt from the XB-1 was shockwaves tend to be unpredictable when the nose is a perfect cone and sometimes tend to blanket the vertical stabilizer, doing so prevents the occurrence and ensures a smooth flow over the nose and aft across the fuselage.

A front view of the Boom Overture: Pic Source: Boom Media Assets

The nose slopes up to the cockpit windshield, the cockpit is the widest and tallest part of the fuselage. Much like the XB-70 Valkyrie where the wasting is clearly visible as the fuselage narrows down towards the tail from the cockpit the Overture does the same. In Fact the black stripes that extend from the cockpit and run rearwards forming an incomplete loop around the widest part of the fuselage looks almost Jumbo Jetish from a top view. The fuselage belly is comparatively flat and a similar design is seen on the XB-1. 

Where the Concorde had a drooping nose which was had heavy hinges and actuators, the Overture does away with the entire mechanism and instead has an augmented reality system tested on the XB-1. If the Overture’s system is like the XB-1’s it will have two 4K cameras that are mounted on the nose gear (so they can be retracted completely in flight), the cameras will be at least one large bird’s wingspan apart to build redundancy against bird strikes. The screen inside the cockpit will display a composite image along with airport markings etc if at ground level. The system is a huge weight saving over the Concorde of approx 1650 pounds.

The gull wings of the Overture have a complex geometry.

Boom – FlyBy – It’s About Time For a Bold New Era of Supersonic Flight . The modified delta planform has several special design tweaks to it. The wing appears to have a dihedral angle at the wing root and inboard section which transitions to an almost flat to anhedral angle at the outboard sections. A positive dihedral (approx 3-5° upward angle) helps with lateral stability and keeps the passenger cabin level at cruise. The flat to slight anhedral angle of approx 1° helps optimize supersonic wave drag while maintaining aileron command. The underside of the wings appear to be blended into the fuselage to soften shockwaves.

A side view of the Overture. Note the wing architecture & staggered engines. Pic Source : Boom Media Assets

A look at the leading edge from the top shows off a clear kink much like a cranked delta on the inboard form. The kink slows down the air over the wing even as the aircraft is supersonic. Imagine if you were running towards a fence that is perpendicular to you, when you hit the fence all of you hits it at once, now imagine the fence is at an angle and kinks slightly towards you, when you first run towards it the first bit goes much faster than the rest of the wing after the kink, even though you are running at the same speed and only a little bits of you hits the fence as you keep running, the same is good for the gull wing. The inboard kink generates a powerful vortex at high AoA over the inboard wing which generates lift at takeoff & landing. The vortex prevents air separation and stalling at high angles of attack.

A top view of the Overture. Note the kinks on the leading and trailing edges of the wings and the cropped wingtips. Pic Source : Boom Media Assets

The steep inboard sweep which is in the region of 70-75° transitions to a shallower sweep in the region of 50°, the sweep change happening at the kink or crank, the leading continues its transitionary sweep through to the wing tips The steep inboard geometry delays shock formation and reduces wave drag at Mach 1.7 while the shallower outboard sweep increases wing area which in turn boosts lift while at the same time delaying stall formation. The crank or kink creates a natural break between the inward vortex lift and the outboard attached flow, such geometry results in superior roll authority across the speed regime.

The leading edge further shows a thicker front view profile than the Concorde did, this helps generate more lift across the speed range while at the same time exhibiting heavy contouring. Where the Concorde had an S curved leading edge that was sharp and thin, the Overture has a more ‘traditional airfoil’ although there is nothing traditional about it. At the wing roots the wings tend to blend upwards (dihedral angle) into the tapering fuselage while they drop downwards (neutral to slight anhedral angle) and lower towards the cropped wingtips. Such a design naturally helps with managing roll and gives the wings the distinctive gullwing shape.

The Overture’s cropped wingtips represent an evolution over the Concorde’s pointed ogival delta tips. On the Concorde the tips maximized the wings aspect ratio (span to average chord ratio) while helping minimize wave drag, however they were vulnerable to flutter (vibrations at high speed) on the overture the cropped wingtips ensure the aircraft maximizes area ruling through the whole profile cross section, while details of the crop are not available, we can expect the wing to be about 10-15% more efficient in fuel burn per passenger. Since a large portion of the flight time will be in the subsonic/transonic regime, the cropped wings lessen induced drag aiding quieter takeoffs (the Overture aims to be below 75dB). At supersonic speeds the sharp tips of the Concorde amplified the sonic boom , while the Overture’s cropped wingtips combined with the gullwing design soften the boom signature.

The trailing edge of the wing has a very obtuse lambda (Λ) on it. The first function of the Λ is vortex control, if you look at it relative to the leading edge kink (the vortex generator) it is slightly outboard from it. The shape helps break up and weaken these vortices as they exit the wing surfaces by inducing geometric discontinuity. The trailing edge shape also acts a sonic boom diffuser by preventing the coalescence of shocks and softening the boom overland. The trailing edge Λ and the kink on the leading edge means the wing is also called a cranked arrow.

The Λ on trailing edge helps low speed handling and stall characteristics by promoting an earlier flow separation at the root encouraging an inboard to outboard stall pattern. The overall wing design should have a washout. The trailing edge Λ further reinforces the area rule ethos of the aircraft. The edge has an inboard flap  inboard of the kink and an outboard flap that appears to begin exactly on the kink. On the outermost part of the edge is the aileron. https://boom-press-assets.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/Newsroom-Media-Assets/Overture/Videos/Overture-Systems-Configuration.mp4

The four symphony engines of the Overture appear staggered  and spaced out with the inboard engines about 5 feet in front of the outboard engines (no specifics available). The staggering enables the coke bottle design (area rule) and synergizes with the wing’s highly sculpted gull wing design to minimize shockwaves at Mach 1.7, increasing range. The offset also helps with yaw control in the case of asymmetric thrust and improves low speed handling as against the Concorde’s close engines placed further back on the aircraft fuselage.The engine setup looks like a B-58 Hustler from the 1950-60s. The Hustler itself was yet another troubled but genius engineering marvel, from a time when supersonic aerodynamics understanding was still in its infancy.

The wings transition towards the empennage of aircraft. Unlike the Concorde that had an ogival delta that used elevons (combination elevators and ailerons) the Overture has a traditional aircraft’s tail with vertical and horizontal stabilizers. The vertical stabilizer’s slanting leading edge appears to land on the top of the wasting fuselage at the same spot the wingtip’s trailing edge outboard corner finishes, respecting the area rule principle. With a height of approx 18-20 feet and an area of 450-500 sq ft the stabilizer has more area than the Concorde’s at 380 sq ft and height of 27 feet. The rudder on the vertical stabilizer enhances directional stability at high AoA and provides authority in an engine out situation.

The span of the horizontal stabilizers is approx 55-60’ and an area of approx 350-400 sq ft. The stabilizers are set at a slight anhedral angle of 3-4° (cannot confirm) work closely with the vertical stabilizer and provide the aircraft with pitch authority. The control surfaces on the horizontal stabilizers are actually at the very tail of the plane and are again placed in such a manner once again to respect area ruling. The stabilizer is trimmable to manage the angle of incidence for various speed regimes and centre of gravity shifts.

An image showing the structure of the Overture. Pic Source : Boom Media Assets

The landing gear of the Overture is a tricycle setup with the nose gear having two wheels which retracts into itself and forward into the fuselage to lessen its volume profile. The main landing gear features six wheels on each bogie , which is highly unusual for an aircraft weighing in at approx 415,000 pounds. So why take on the additional weight and space? Delta winged aircraft have a normal landing speed of approx 140-160 kts which is considerably faster than a normal subsonic airliner which 135 kts such a speed will require additional braking power plus the added redundancy in case of a blow out.

AoA at take off and landing has always been the central focus to the Concorde’s design. At take off the Concorde’s AoA was between 15-18° and landing approx 15-17°, such an angle was steep enough to entail the droop nose to manage visibility. The Overture with it’s wing and tail design is expected to have a take off AoA of approx 12-14° and a landing AoA of approx 11-13°. Visibility is managed by the augmented reality cameras spoken of earlier. For reference the 777 has a take off AoA of between 12-18° and touchdown of between 6-8°. The Overture aims to have an almost subsonic aircraft type of landing angle.

Design reference points: Boom – Overture & https://boom-press-assets.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/Newsroom-Media-Assets/Overture/Videos/Overture-Systems-Configuration.mp4

The Engines

Engines are the key to any aircraft’s success and in the case of SST’s they assume an added importance. They need to be capable of speed, be quiet & efficient in addition to being 100% SAF (Sustainable Aviation Fuel) compatible. Such engines can be expensive to develop and need fresh though and innovation at each step of the design and construction process. To understand SAF read here. https://theaviationevangelist.com/2025/09/25/alternative-aviation-fuels/

By 2017 Boom was on the lookout for an engine partner and Rolls Royce looked the part with their previous experience developing Concorde’s Olympus Snecma 593 turbojets. The partnership with Boom looked like the natural step forward ushering in the sustainable supersonic era (the engines were to be 100% SAF compatible) and the partnership was announced with much fanfare in July 2020. After two years embedded with the Boom Team in Colorado as they narrowed down engine specs and characteristics and then the partnership fell through in September 2022 and by December 2022 Boom decided it was going to develop the Boom Symphony engines inhouse. The parting was cordial but stiff with RR saying that developing a supersonic engine was low on their priorities list and Boom stating they were appreciative of RR’s work.

The reality was RR was wary of another Concorde like disaster where they lost the equivalent of $1.32 Bn per aircraft and did not have the wherewithal to go through the development pains in the tough economic scenario the World was currently in (COVID). Boom for their side felt the engines offered, a low bypass Pearl 700 used in Bombardier Jets aiming for 30-35,000 pounds of thrust per engine with modifications such as the inlets and exhaust with chevrons would seriously compromise efficiency by approx 23-30% below Boom’s targets. Several options were studied but nothing came off. There was added pressure on RR with the worldview on emissions (supersonic aircraft burn 3X fuel compared to subsonic aircraft) and RR’s failed partnership with Airion developing the infinity engine which ended in 2021 with Airion folding up.

Further partnerships were explored by Boom with GE, Pratt & Whitney and even Safran but all of them declined to partner, this is when Boom decided they are going it alone.

The Boom Symphony. Pic Source: Boom Media Assets

The exterior dimensions of the Symphony engine are a length of 42 feet & height of 7 feet. The supersonic inlet is 12 feet in length with the variable geometry exhaust at 19 feet, the turbofan and sprint sore section at 11 feet.The Symphony is a medium bypass twin spool engine with 3 low pressure & 6 high pressure compressors with no afterburner developing 40,000 pounds of thrust per engine.The design of the engine is optimized to the Overture and is 100% SAF compatible.

All engines have three phases suck, bang & blow. The suck is done by the main frontal fan and compressors. The bang is in the sprint core and the blow is through the high & low pressure turbines just before the exhaust.

The inlet of any SST engine is where the magic happens. While the aircraft is supersonic the engines can only gulp in air at between 400-500 mph. The inlet is where the air is slowed down by use of shockwave creation. In the case of Concorde a series of ramps and bleed valves for excess air was used to slow the air down to approx 500 mph from Mach 2. The architecture of the Overture and Symphony is different where the engines are podded below the wings instead of being integrated into them in a cluster as on the Concorde. The Inlet of the Symphony is axis symmetric with a spike at the central axis (much like the Lockheed SR-71). The spike moves back and forth as per the speed of the aircraft and manages the inlet shockwave. In the case of the SR-71 the central spike moved back up to 26” at high supersonic flight. The Symphony will probably be up 18” (speculation).

Boom is currently in the advanced prototyping phase and last month they announced that 95% of all parts were done and have been moved to manufacture. Boom is making use of extensive 3D printing of parts at their printer farm (additive manufacturing) for a number of parts being used in the Symphony prototyping phase. The Sprint Core currently being tested has 193 3D printed parts. The alloy used is Haynes 282 a nickel based alloy that can withstand extreme heat and stress.Such an approach enables rapid prototyping & iteration. An example of the speed they work at is they prefer vertical integration (in-house manufacture) vs waiting upto six months for parts to be delivered and choose to spend a couple of million dollars on the required machine instead.

Currently the Sprint core is being tested at Georgia Tech’s Combustion laboratory where the hot section is currently being put through its paces. Similarly each component of the engine will be tested independently, such an approach saves time and helps with iterations. Once testing is complete across all the engine components, they are integrated into the prototype engines, fired up and parameters checked.

Blake says the Symphony expects to generate thrust early 2026. Such a tight timeline places great pressure on the propulsion team.

Generating 40,000 pounds of thrust on-time is critical to Boom’s future funding (will speak about this).

Symphony Reference: Fact Sheet

The Superfactory, Construction, Assembly & Partners

The 180,000 sq ft Boom Superfactory has been constructed by BE&K building group and cost approx $100 Mn to construct. Boom Supersonic Overture Superfactory | BE&K Building Group . The superfactory is at Piedmont Triad International Airport in North Carolina on 65 acres of leased land, which incidentally will also host the factory producing JetZero’s Z4 Blended Wing Body Aircraft. As per a press release, Boom plans to invest $500 Mn in NC of which the building is $100 Mn, that leaves approx $400 Mn in terms of tooling yet to come in. Governor Cooper Announces Boom Will Manufacture Supersonic Aircraft in North Carolina Creating More Than 1,750 Jobs by 2030 . The Superfactory is where the final assembly of the Overture will take place and there is an entire ecosystem of partners involved in constructing the individual parts. Some of them are Aernova for the wings (they list Boom as a top innovation). https://www.aernnova.com/products/wings . Safran Landing Systems will be manufacturing the Overtures beautiful landing gear. https://boomsupersonic.com/press-release/boom-supersonic-and-safran-landing-systems-sign-supplier-agreement-for-overture . The Overture’s empannage is manufactured by Aciturri.There are several other key component suppliers who are part of the ecosystem to help make the Overture flight ready.Fact Sheet. All of them are currently design ready .

Most of the Overture will be carbon composite including the fuselage, wings & empennage. Titanium will probably be used in high stress areas such as the landing gear, engine bays and wing & stabilizer leading edges. The engine internals will have alloys such as Inconel in addition to Haynes 282 mentioned earlier. The Superfactory will have autoclaves (large ovens that cure the layered prepeg under pressure). To put a cost perspective autoclaves can cost up to $4 Mn a pop.

The Overture inflight. Pic Source: Boom Media Assets

Cash Runway

Developing the Overture is estimated to cost approx $8 Bn up from a previous estimation of $6 Bn. Boom has so far raised approx $700 Mn through 12 rounds of funding and the investors have shown patience through the iterations process. However Boom is still well short of the required number by a long way. An IPO might be a way forward, but it will not bridge the gap.

The last funding round in late 2024 was termed as a series A showing a reset within the company, the valuation down to $584 from peak valuations of $1Bn and even $6Bn after the Aug’24 funding. Looking at the volatility of the valuation, it is extremely important for Boom’s Symphony engines to generate 40,000 pounds of thrust in early 2026, this can very well pitch the valuation up skywards and open a round of extremely high funding, Boom should target at least $1 Bn or more (thrust is the single most important milestone from here on) raised after the thrust milestone. 

In Nov ’23 Neom Investment Fund invested in Boom as a strategic investment. NIF is a subsidiary of Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) and is a key vehicle to Prince Mohd Bin Salman’s Vision 2030, an ambitious plan to diversify Saudi Arabia from its oil dependence. If PIF’s investment in Lucid Motors is any indicator where they have become a majority shareholder with over $8 Bn invested in a relatively short period. Boom has much to look forward to as they generate thrust and tool up their superfactory.

An IPO will probably be at either the Overture’s first supersonic flight or just as FAA certification progresses past 50%. Boom has been working very closely with the FAA at each step and only moves with each part after the FAA certifies it, this vastly cuts lead time. Some of the other aerospace startups like Joby & Archer Aviation have valuations that are at ± $10 Bn and Boom should target at least that much if not more.

Innovation at Work.

Before you Leave.

Read More Amazing Content at: https://theaviationevangelist.com keep scrolling down, do share.

Follow me:

LinkedIn : https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-aviation-evangelist/

X : @ManiRayaprolu

Reddit : r/theaviationevangelist

Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61583497868441#

https://www.instagram.com/theaviationevangelist?igsh=ZjA5YXI3MWd3OGZs&utm_source=qr

Introduction

The F-117 & the B-2 have firmly ingrained the shape of stealth in our collective imagination. Stealth represents the pinnacle of technology, power & supremacy. To truly understand stealth we need to go back to the beginning.

Stealth is a form of camouflage. The earliest forms were natural cover for example in forests, armies marching by night or hunters disguising themselves to blend with their surroundings. In the early days of aviation stealth as a concept did not exist. Flying in WW1 was mainly at night or Zeppelins flew noiselessly at high altitudes or under cover of night.

The concept of Radar was first introduced in 1886 by Heinrich Hertz who observed that radio waves deflect off metal bodies. The development of Radar in the 1920s & 1930s by both Germany & Britain also began the idea of radar avoidance. There was little understanding of how Radars actually detected metal objects or the concept of RCS (Radar Cross Section).

The first experiments with stealth began in WW2 and the most famous example of stealth albeit accidental is the Ho-229 by the Horten Brothers. A flying wing that had a severely curtailed RCS due to its combination of design & materials. Another example of accidental stealth is the  DeHavilland Mosquito, which had a low RCS because it was made of wood.

These aircraft are considered stealth generation zero some stealth and high maneuverability.

The Lockheed SR-71 and the Blackbird Family of aircraft are the first aircraft where stealth was conciously applied.  The Blended Wing Fuselage (read : https://theaviationevangelist.com/2025/09/19/the-flying-wing-part-two-the-blended-wing-body/ ) and inward canted vertical stabilizers were intended to divert radio waves away from the emitter/receiver in addition to the fins being contructed from early composite materials.

The most popular image of the Lockheed SR-71 in flight. One that I first saw in 1975. Pic Source : Wikipedia

The paint on the aircraft was radar absorbing and consisted of iron particles to convert radar waves to heat, plasma stealth was experimented on the A-12 Oxcart where fuel contained a cesium based additive that created an ionized cloud of exhaust to absorb radar waves. The RCS of the SR-71 was bigger than a bird but smaller than a man. The SR-71’s biggest weapon was its speed at over Mach 3.0

The Blackbird Family of aircraft are the first generation of stealth combining speed and low maneuverability.

The Concept of Stealth was formalized by Russian electrical engineer & mathematical physicist Pyotr Ufemtsev when he published his epochal research now known as ‘Physical Theory of Diffraction’ (PTD) in 1962.

Pyotr Ufemtsev

While at Institute 108 (a key institute in the research of radio & radar technology) in 1954 Ufemtsev began his research into the reflection of electromagnetic waves and began developing a high frequency theory for predicting the scattering of electromagnetic waves from 2 & 3D objects.The shapes of the objects included discs, cylinders, cones, flat bases and wires in addition to several other geometrical shapes. These findings together came to be known as PTD and were published in his book ‘ Method of Edge Waves in the Physical Theory of Diffraction’ (PTD for short) in 1962.

The Russian think tank deemed the findings to have no significant military value and okayed his book to be published internationally. And the book languished for over a decade, before it was rediscovered by Denys Overholser of Lockheed. However this comes later.

Ufemtsev continued with his research in yet another gray forgotten facility in the former USSR for another twenty years. Gorbachev’s Perestroika gained traction in 1985 and the scientific funding that most of the institutes in the USSR received began to dry up. In the words of Ufemtsev, science took a back seat and political reform took center stage.

Pyotr Ufemtsev the Father of Stealth. Pic Source : Wikipedia

In 1989 Ufemtsev was in Stockholm to attend the Technology Symposium when in his own words he was surrounded by about ten Americans who said they were his students. You can imagine his shock as most of these ‘students’ looked middle aged and were professors themselves. One of them was from the University of California and offered him a position of visiting faculty. By this time USSR had almost fallen and Ufentsev was free to leave, which he did and Ufemtsev & his family found themselves in sunny California in University accommodation. It was here that could resume his research that was close to his heart. He was asked for a plan of reserach and funds were released direct from NASA to UCLA.

All this while Ufemtsev claims he was unaware stealth aircraft were being developed using his theory. His lecture at the 1992 National Convention of Science & Technology in Nice, France was one which was closely anticipated and watched by the Americans! Why? You might ask, the lecture was about how to defeat stealth.

Most radars of the time were monostatic radars. To put it simply, both the receiver and the transmitter of the radar are in one unit, so radio waves travel both and forth down the same corridor. At full absorption the radio energy is at coefficient zero or 50% absorption. He further explained that stealth aircraft were surrounded by a dispersed energy field, however there was no physical manner of decoding this. 

The other manner of defeating stealth was to have the bistatic or multistatic radars, where the transmitters and receivers are separated by varying distances. This increases the complexity of the unit, however as stealth aircraft are primarily about deflecting the radio waves away from the transmitter, the chances of being caught in a multi static radar array are much higher. The technology has been around since the 1920s, however post Ufemtsev’s lecture and the continued rise of stealth, bi/multistatic radar has seen a resurgence since the 1990s.

Into his 90s now Ufemtsev is the father of stealth. 

Project Harvey

The 1973 Yom Kippur war was a major wake up call for the US. The 19 day war was lethal for US made aircraft. Of the total 102 aircraft lost, 85 were American made, 32 F-4 Phantoms & 53 A-4 Skyhawks. The Soviet made S-75 Dvina missiles were part of an integrated air defense system supplied by the USSR to the Egyptian & Syrian forces were lethal against Israeli aircraft.

The war and result was a huge wake up call for DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) who initiated Project Harvey. Harvey the name from Harvey the Rabbit an invisible six foot tall white rabbit from the 1950 movie.

US strategic planners realized the vulnerability US aircraft & forces faced if they were ever to be in a similar high threat environment. In 1974 Chuck Myers, Director of Air Warfares Programs, espoused the ‘ Harvey ‘ concept to Robert Moore, Deputy Director of DARPA. They needed a new aircraft that would be invisible to enemy radar, infrared and other sensors. The idea almost immediately gained the support of the Pentagon and DARPA took the lead. This led to the highly classified ‘Have Blue’ program. DARPA invited McDonnell Douglas, Grumman, General Dynamics, Fairchild & Northrop. Lockheed was a surprise entry, they were initially not invited, however they leveraged their experience with the A-12 & SR-71 projects with DARPA and won an invite.

The final two projects accepted by DARPA were Northrop & Lockheed and after testing both model mockups (they were surprisingly similar) Lockheed won, and this would result in the legendary F-117 Nighthawk.

Have Blue & The F-117 Nighthawk

Ben Rich who succeeded Kelly Johnson as Director of Lockheed Skunk Works put together a team of talented individuals across several critical fields,  they consisted of Bill Schroeder a veteran designer, Dick Sherrer preliminary designer, Denys Overholser among many famous names.

Denys Overholser recommended an aircraft with flat surfaces. In Overholser’s own words “Well, it’s simple, you just make it out of flat surfaces and tilt those surfaces over, sweeping the edges away from the radar view angle, and that way you basically cause the energy to reflect away from the radar”. Using Overholser’s recommendations, Dick Scherrer drew a preliminary aircraft with low RCS. The aircraft had faceted surfaces. The aircraft looked like anything but an aircraft and definitely did not look like it would fly.

The original Hopeless Diamond. Pic Source : Wikipedia

Over the next several weeks Overholser and Scroeder put together a computer team to create a prediction software called ‘Echo 1’. Ufemtsev’s calculations were incorporated into the software (Ufemtsev’s work had been translated by USAF Systems Command Foreign Technology Division which Overholser accidentally discovered). The final design would be a faceted delta wing that was stuck with the name ‘Hopeless Diamond’ a reference to the famous Hope Diamond at Smithsonian. The team took six months to convert Ufemtsev’s calculus to design. On March 7th 1974 at 02:47 a.m the code had its moment of epiphany, pyramids reflected no radar. These shapes were to be incorporated into Have Blue. Kelly Johnson who was sceptical of stealth said to Ben Rich “Our old D-21 drone (a mach 3.3 drone, Kelly Johnson loved speed) has a lower cross section than that goddam diamond”. The shape of Have Blue was limited by the computing power available at the time to create complex shapes, and hence the extremely faceted design.

Have Blue. Pic Source : PICRYL

In the summer of 1975 DARPA formally invited Northrop & Lockheed to develop the Experimental Survivable Testbest (XST). Both the shapes looked surprisingly similar. Northrop used a software called ‘GENSCAT’ similar to ‘Echo 1’. By Nov 1975 both Lockheed and Northrop were awarded $1.5 mn each to build a full scale mockup of their designs to be tested for their RCS signatures. It is important to remember here the designs were about stealth and not about aerodynamics. Lockheed won the round and were asked to build a flying test bed. Northrop were asked to continue with their own development, but were not part of Have Blue anymore.

Northrop’s XST. Pic Source : Reddit User

Lockheed were to build two demonstrators for testing and Ben Rich raised over $10 mn from Lockheed management for development. The demonstrators were ¼ th the size of the final F-117 Nighthawk. They had a wing sweep of 72.5° and had an inverse V tail. It had a wingspan of 22’6” and a length of 47’3” and a MTOW of 12,500 lbs. The small aircraft was powered by two GE J85 turbojets that developed 2950 pounds of thrust each giving it a max speed of 600 mph.

The shape of the aircraft meant it was extremely unstable and it had a quadruple redundancy fly by wire control system that gave the aircraft normal flying characteristics. However actual flights tended to be extremely wobbly, something the F-117 shared with Have Blue and came to be called Woblin Goblin. The two prototypes flew a total of 88 flights between them, before both of them crashed. HB1001 flew a total of 36 sorties and HB1002 flew a total of 52 sorties. Both the pilots were safe. The Have Blue shape was very similar to what Ufemtsev had envisaged.

Overlap comparison of Have Blue & the F-117 Nighthawk. Pic Source: PICRYL

The final shape of the F-117 Nighthawk  had sides that were at least 30° off the vertical with multiple polygonal shapes. The aircraft now sported a V tail. The serrated edges that would be found on the F-117 Nighthawk were all about diverting radar waves away from the point of origin. The final radar cross section of the F-117 is about 0.001 m2 . The length was 65’11” and wingspan was 43’4”, the MTOW was 52,500 pounds with internal weapons bays.

The F-117 was powered by two modified GE F404 – F1D2 family of low bypass turbo fans. In the interest of stealth the engines had no afterburners. The engines were buried deep inside the aircraft to avoid radar waves hitting the fan blades as these give a very loud RCS return. Furthermore both the intakes were covered by a composite radar absorbing grill, so any radar waves that got in would not get out again. The exhaust was buried in a ‘platypus tail’ which was wide, rectangular and flat, furthermore exhaust heat was managed inside the long, buried exhaust duct lined with heat absorbing exhaust tiles. The bypass air was ducted over the tiles to cool them and further facilitate hot exhaust gas mixing with ambient cold air. Furthermore the hot exhaust air was directed at a very narrow angle just behind and above the aircraft.

Rearview and top view of the F-117. Note the faceted shape and exhaust. Pic Source : Wiki Commons

The F-117 had almost one ton of radar absorbent material (RAM) consisting of several composites. The RAM actually impacted load and trim. The first was iron ball paint which consisted of polymer based paint infused with ferrite. The second was several layers of carbon based layered composite materials. When radar waves hit the iron balls oscillate and convert the electromagnetic waves to heat which is dissipated by the aircraft body. The RAM was cut much like a linoleum sheet and glued to the aircraft skin. The gaps between the panels were filled with a putty called butter. This ensured a seamless face to radar with no gaps. The glass of the cockpit was coated with a special composite mixture to absorb radar waves as well. In fact at one point of time Skunk Works toyed with filling up the cockpit with Carbon Monoxide, which would mask the pilot, however this was firmly rebutted by the pilots themselves!

The F-117 had a hinged radio antenna that hinged back into the aircraft body. Once retracted it meant the aircraft was silent with no contact. The pitot tubes themselves were designed to divert radar away from the emitter. In fact they were so sharp that one could cut a finger on them. The main pitot tube speed incicator had one hole that flew directly into the path of oncoming air for airspeed. This was also right out front in clean air. One of the reasons the F-117 did not go supersonic was to avoid shockwaves coming off the tube.

While Have Blue first flew in 1977, it was a black project and was only publicly disclosed in Nov 1988 after the disclosure of the B-2. 

The flyaway cost of each aircraft was $45 in 1981 dollars.

The F-117A is the second generation of stealth combining stealth with reasonable agility.

Tacit Blue & the B-2 Spirit

The Northrop Tacit Blue was a low observable stealth surveillance technology demonstrator aircraft. The aircraft could operate close or behind enemy lines with a high degree of survivability due its low probability of intercept radar (LIPR) and other sensors. The aircraft flew between 1982 – 85 but was publicly unveiled only in 1996.

The designation YF-117D represents an evolution on both Have Blue & F-117 programs. Tacit Blue was about demonstrating not only the next level of stealth design but other advances such as radar sensor technology was part of the ‘ Assault Breaker ‘ program that included technologies such as lasers, electro optical sensors, data processors etc that could break up ground launches working together in unison.

Tacit Blue. Pic Source : Wikipedia

Tacit Blue, nicknamed ‘ the whale / alien school bus’ featured a straight tapered wing with a V tail.. The fuselage was curved in a manner to cut RCS, and ended in a rectangular edge all round that protruded. The engines had a single flush inlet on top of the fuselage that led to a S shaped curve as did the exhaust. The exhaust did not have the ceramic tiles the F-117 had but was instead lined with radar absorbent and heat resistant coatings. The exhaust nozzle itself was flat, wide and a curved arc that blended into the highly curved body. The nozzle was placed between the V tail. The setup ensured the engines would have no exhaust / intake signature on radar. 

Rearview of Tacit Blue. Pic Source: Wikipedia

The aircraft featured concealed radar as mentioned earlier so it could be in touch with its ecosystem at all times. The radar did not interfere with its RCS signature. The shape of Tacit Blue was possible because of strides in computing power that in turn enabled more complex radar cheating shapes. Overall a look at Tacit Blue tells you of a shape is continuous with no breaks and very reminiscent of the B-2 Spirit.

The aircraft used two Garrett ATF-3-6 medium bypass turbofans that produced 5,440 pounds of thrust each. The engines propelled the whale at 290 mph, which is reasonable considering the aim of the aircraft was reconnaissance and not speed. The aircraft had a service ceiling of between 25-30,000 feet. 

The materials used on the aircraft were aluminium for the fuselage and wings structure with Titanium in structural components. The empennage, wing & fuselage leading edges used proprietary Northrop radar absorbent composite materials. The RAM continued to use ferrite materials that were highly radar absorbent, however unlike the F-117 the material could be applied to the continuous curved surfaces and not have to use butter in between panels.

Tacit Blue flew a total 135 sorties and 250 hours over a three year period and gathered valuable data that was used in the B-2 Spirit. 

The B-2 was the spiritual successor to Tacit Blue. It incorporated several technologies from both Tacit & Have Blue. The S shaped engine intakes and active exhaust gas management. The curved surfaces of Tacit Blue showed that improvements in computing power meant stealth aircraft shapes could be complex curves. The radar integration on Tacit Blue is on the B-2 as well. 

The Advanced Technology Bomber program as the B-2 was known began in 1979. The black project codenamed Aurora narrowed on the Northrop/Boeing & Lockheed/Rockwell teams to begin preliminary work. Both the teams came up with Flying Wing designs with Northrop’s proposal codenamed ‘Senior Ice’ & Lockheed’s as ‘Senior Peg’. Northrop’s proposal won as they already had experience with flying wings from their YB-35/49 days , their aircraft was larger & was a pure flying wing. Lockheed’s proposal was more like its Have Blue program featured a faceted design and incorporated a small tail. Northrop was awarded the contract in late 1981.

Senior Peg by Lockheed. Pic Source : TWZ

For the Northrop the B-2 Spirit was the culmination of almost 40 years on flying wing aircraft ( read: https://theaviationevangelist.com/2025/09/13/the-evolution-of-the-flying-wing-part-one/ ). Flying wings are naturally stealthy along with the technologies validated by participating in the Have Blue and Tacit Blue programs.

In its final form the B-2 is a lambda wing and is made of mostly carbon graphite composite material, with buried engines that have S shaped ducts for intakes and active exhaust management. The RAM on the B-2 is even more advanced than on the F-117 & Tacit Blue. While the material continues to be classified we can speculate it uses alternate high frequency material to reduce maintenance post each sortie. The iron ball paint technology is probably used as well in addition to signature control materials such as sealants (butter?), and conductive tapes. All of this gives the B-2 a radar profile of 0.1 m2 .To protect the coatings the B-2 is stored in environmentally controlled hangers called B-2 shelter systems (B2SS).

The B-2 Spirit. Pic Source : Wikipedia

The length of the B-2 is 69 feet with a wingspan of 172 feet (same as the YB35/49) and a height of 17 feet. Its MTOW is 376,000 pounds. The engines on the B-2 are four GE F118 non afterburning low bypass turbofans that develop 17,300 pounds of thrust each. The cruise speed of the B-2 is 630 mph with a service ceiling of 50,000 feet and a range of 6,900 miles, all phenomenal statistics considering it is almost never seen!

By 2004 the total program had cost $44.75 bn. Calculating the cost over 21 aircraft produced the cost per aircraft comes to $2.1 bn!

The B-2 represents the third generation in the stealth technology evolution.

The YF-23 & the F-22 Raptor

By 1986 the Soviet Union had several emerging threats such as the Sukhoi Su-27, the Mikoyoyan MIG-29 fighters and the under development Beriev A-50 airborne warning & control system (AWACS) along with increasingly sophisticated SAMs. The US needed to replace its aging air superiority fighter the F-15 Eagle. The Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) would use the stealth technologies developed along with advanced avionics, fly by wire systems, and advanced propulsion systems. Lockheed and Northrop were invited by DARPA as lead contractors of their respective teams due to their previous experience with all of the above. Lockheed’s proposal was dubbed the YF-22 & Northrop’s YF-23. Both aircraft had very similar properties.

The YF-23 with the B-2 coming in at Edwards AFB. Pic Source : Wikipedia

The YF-23 nicknamed ‘ Black Widow II’ had two prototypes built. Northrop teamed up with McDonnell Douglas and the prototypes would run both Pratt & Whitney and General Electric engines. So while this was a competition between airframe manufacturers it was a competition between engine manufacturers as well.

Three design concepts were studied, the Agile Maneuverable Fighter (AMF) with two vertical tails, that had the best handling but the least stealth was the first. The second was the Ultra Stealth Fighter (USF) that had the best stealth characteristics called the Christmas Tree due to its design and the third was the High Stealth Fighter (HSF) which balanced stealth and maneuverability. It had diamond shaped wings and all moving V tail rudders. The third would eventually become the YF-23.Northrop received $691 mn as did Lockheed and given 50 months to create for demonstration & validation (Dem/Val) two prototypes each.

The three designs Northrop assessed. Pic Source: Wikipedia

The YF-23s faceted & blended fuselage with its diamond shaped wings had very good RCS return of 0.001m2 , the steeply canted V tail (at 50°) gave the aircraft the agility it needed while at the same time blocking out the engine exhausts. The tail itself had the span of a small aircraft. A top view of the aircraft shows an alignment of all the edges along a couple of axis, this is critical to control radar return in a very narrow corridor. The engine intakes (at the entrance had a porous section) again had S shaped ducts similar to the B-2 and the exhaust had active gas cooling with ceramic tiles similar to the F-117. All weapons and radars were carried internally. The RAM continued to use the ‘iron ball paint’. Critical parts such as the all moving tail were made of advanced composite materials with high radar absorption. 

The YF-23 was tested with both the engine options. On the P&W YF119 option YF-23A number 1 flew a total of 34 flights for 44.3 hours. The maximum AoA at minimum speed was 25°, while the max speed was Mach 1.8 at maximum altitude of 50,000 feet..impressive numbers.

Prototype number 2 flew with the GE YF120 option, clocked 16 flights for a total of 21.6 flight hours. The max AoA at min speed was 20°, while max speed was Mach 1.72 at 50,000 feet max altitude. 

Both sets of numbers are impressive, while both the engines had afterburners the YF-23 could cruise comfortably at Mach 1.4-1.6 without them. An F-16 needed to afterburn to keep up.

The final specs of the aircraft was a length of 67’5”, wingspan of 43’7” and height of 13’11”. A MTOW of 51,320 pounds. The engines tested were two P&W YF119 and two GE YF120 that generated 23,500 pounds of thrust each (YF120) dry or 35,000 pounds with afterburner. The prototypes had to be constructed within a 3 month month period as their 50 month deadline was running out.

Lockheed teamed up with Boeing and General Dynamics to create the YF-22 which would become the F-22 Raptor. As stealth took centre stage the design team at Lockheed Skunk Works led by Bart Osborne moved away from its SR-71 type designs and once again came up with a design very similar to the F-117s faceted shape as they used the same computer program Echo 1. This design gave very poor aerodynamic handling characteristics. They needed to get better. They needed a design more like Northrop’s curved blended aircraft.

The final design submitted by Lockheed and team was vastly improved on the faceted design, incorporating curved shapes and surfaces. While the computers were not able to handle the design, physical reliance on radar range testing improved RCS while the curved shapes helped aerodynamics. The final design submitted for Dem/Val designated 090P had an arrow head forward fuselage, trapezoidal wings that had a steep crank on the leading edge and four empennage tail surfaces. The engines used the now familiar S shaped inlet and the rectangular exhaust nozzles and this is where the magic happened.

A screen grab showing the F-22 aligned edges. Pic Source: Western Museum of Flight

The nozzles featured a 2D thrust vectoring system that pivoted the exhaust stream down by up to 20°. This in conjunction with the all moving horizontal tail planes in conjunction with the twin vertical stabilizers (canted at 28°) gave the aircraft incredible pitch and stability control. And this probably won the F-22 Raptor contract.

The aircraft was constructed of composites which have now become a trend in stealth aircraft in addition to leading / trailing edge alignment all round. The large fins continue to mask the engine exhaust. The RAM on the YF-22 is a proprietary formula developed by Lockheed and Boeing an advancement on the iron ball paint formula and is done in layers. All hatches and openings on the aircraft are serrated much like the YF-23 to deflect radar waves away. In addition the surface of the aircraft is multiple shades of gray, these are different materials bonded together to further deflect radar waves and reduce RCS.

The first prototype with GE 120 engine first flew in September 1990 while the second with the P&W engines first flew in Oct the same year. The prototype with the GE 120 engines did a total of 43 flights for a total of 52.8 hours, maximum AoA at min speed was an insane 60°, while maximum speed was over Mach 2 at max altitude of 50,000 feet. The prototype with P&W engines flew a total of 31 flights for 38.8 flight hours, max AoA at min speed was 20° while max speed was MAch 1.81 at 45,000 feet. 

The YF-22 won, but it needs be said the YF-23 is a legendary aircraft in its own right. The F-22 Raptor final specs were a length of 62’1” and a wingspan of 44’6”. The MTOW is 83,500 pounds and is powered by P&W F119 engines that develop 26,000 pounds of thrust each dry and 35,000 pounds of thrust each with afterburner. The max speed is Mach 2.25 and range is 1,800 miles.

A total of 195 F-22 Raptors were constructed at a cost of $67.3 bn, at a unit program acquisition cost of over $350m each as the construction numbers were heavily curtailed from 750 as the costs proved to be prohibitively expensive and shifting priorities after the end of the Cold War.

The F-22 Raptor is the fourth generation of stealth incorporating speed and maneuverability.

The F-35 Lighting & The Democratization of Stealth

In 1993 DARPA launched the affordable Common Affordable Strike Lightweight Strikefighter (CALF) project to develop a stealth aircraft that would eventually repace the F-16, F-18 &Harrier across forces. The Joint Advanced Strike Technology project started in 1994. Congress order both of them to be merged and this became the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). The fighter needed to a versitile fighter that was capable of Short Take Off & Vertical Landing (STOVL) and be capable of a supersonic dash while being stealthy. There were four submissions Mc Donnel Douglas, Northrop, Lockheed & Boeing.

By 1996 the two finalists were Lockheed and Boeing. Both were awarded $750 million each to build two concept demonstrators each. Boeing would develop the X-32 & Lockheed the X-35.

Boeing’s strategy was about keeping lifecycle costs down by minimizing variations across applications. The X-32 had a carbon fibre composite delta wing with a 55° sweep angle and a thick leading edge. This allowed the aircraft to have minimal transonic drag , aid lift at lower speeds and carry radio antennas internally.

The X-32 used a single P&W F119 powerplant that put out 28,000 pounds of thrust , dry and 43,000 pounds of thrust with afterburner. For STOVL the aircraft used thrust vectoring where the engine nozzle moved down upto 15°. The aircraft had a V tail canted to 58° each and an air intake that was directly beneath the cockpit reminicent of the F-16 and unfortunately could not achieve the kind of stealth required.

The Boeing X-35 prototype. Pic Source: Wikipedia

The final specs of the aircraft show a length of 45’0.1”, wingspan of 36’ & height of 17’3.8”. The MTOW of the aircraft was 38,000 pounds with all weapons to be carried internally. The max speed of the aircraft was 1,200 mph max range across profiles was 850 miles in the USAF profile. 

The X-35 used many design elements from the F-22 Raptor (and does not need to repeated) and the VTOL exhaust duct from the Covair Model 200 from 1972. Furthermore Lockheed had purchased technical data from the cancelled Russian Yak-141 for examination of its swivel nozzle in 1991. The aircraft used helmet mounted display systems that had already been around to integrate into the hardware.

The stand out element of the X-35 was the shaft driven lift turbofan. The design was pateneted by Lockheed engineer Paul Bevilaqua and developed by Roll Royce. During normal flight the engine behaved as a normal medium bypass turbofan with afterburners. The turbofan also acted as a turboshaft engine where the engine produces shaft power instead of jet thrust a concept used in helicopters.

The engine nozzle, shaft & hover fan assembly of the F-35. Pic Source: Wikipedia

Where the X-35 differs is only a portion of the jet’s power is directed to the shaft, the rest of the power is still directed towards a thrust vectoring engine nozzle for hover mode. The nozzle can swvel to an astonishing 95° using the 3 Bearing Swivel Duct Nozzle (3BSD). The aircraft can transition from normal flight mode to hover inflight. The shaft in turn drove a two stage titanium lift fan that was 50” in diameter. The entire fan assembly and housing weiged in 1.2 tons, a deadweight during normal flight. In the interests of stealth the far was closed out from both top & bottom when not in use and was a dead weight during normal flight.

The X-35 inflight. Pic Source: Wikipedia

The final specs of the aircraft was a length of 50’5” , wingspan of 33’ & height of 13’3”. The MTOW was 50,000 pounds and powerplant was the P&W F119 turbofan that generated 25,000 pounds of thrust dry and 40,000 pounds with afterburner. The max speed was Mach 1.5+ and a max range of 1,400 miles with a service ceiling of 50,000 feet.

The X-35 won mainly on the basis of its extremely versitality and would become the F-35 Lightening. The final unit cost of an average of just over $100 mn a unit across variants represents a huge improvement in costs.

The F-35 represents the Fifth Generation of stealth aircraft.

Since the 2010s as stealth technology has been better undertood & costs bought down countries such as China & Russia we have seen a raft of stealth aircraft make their way into pubic awareness. Of these the J-50 & J-36 from China stand out as they incorporate All Moving Wingtips (AMT) along with tailess designs ( read here : https://theaviationevangelist.com/2025/10/02/lambda-wings-moving-wingtips-flying-wings-part-3/ ). The Chinese also have the J-20. Tailess aircraft being naturally stealthy. A late edit: A Chinese Team has recently unveiled an evolutionary new stealth material that has a durable and flexible coating that is extremely thin at just 0.1mm. Furthermore one of its properties is impedance tuning , adjusting dynamically to ambient surroundings including temperature. Such a property is critical to advanced stealth as it controls the material’s interaction with incoming electromagnetic waves from radars within range. This is a developing story and not many details are known yet.The Russian Su-57 is another example of stealth technology at work. The US has the B-21 Raider the the F-47 under development, both of them promise to be interesting developments in the evolution of stealth.

Stealth is the standard by which air superiority aircraft are measured.

The Future

The advent of drones like the loyal wingman, the Lockheed Vectiss is a stealth drone that flies ahead in high risk environments and ensure surviveability for airmen. This also represents the connected environment stealth enconpasses, it’s not just about stealth its about communicating effectively.

Stealth has spurred the evolution of radars. Bistatic & multistatic radars are getting more sophisticated (they are complex). RAM is optimized for high frequency but low frequency are getting better at stealth aircraft detection. Over the Horizon radars have the ability to monitor vast areas by bouncing their waves off the ionosphere. AI is playing a big hand in patching multiple data points to create a single picture this strenthens existing infrastructure. 

Quantum radar is in its infancy. Quantum radar looks at subtle changes in photons through quantum entanglement , this will render current stealth technology ineffective. We are getting better at detecting Ufemtsev’s theoretical radiation bubble around stealth aircraft. 

The next level of stealth is a cloaking device much like Star Trek!

Read More Amazing Content at: https://theaviationevangelist.com do keep scrolling down, and do share

Follow me:

LinkedIn : https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-aviation-evangelist/

X : @ManiRayaprolu

Reddit : r/theaviationevangelist

Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61583497868441#

https://www.instagram.com/theaviationevangelist?igsh=ZjA5YXI3MWd3OGZs&utm_source=qr

The BWB is Born

As J W Dunne was conducting his early flying wing tests, there were  developments happening across the Atlantic in Europe. For the very first time, engineers were thinking of using the insides of the wings. A design philosophy was born.

The JetZero Z4. Pic Source: JetZero Website

The Pioneers

In 1910 Hugo Junkers of Germany patented a cantilever tailless wing design. It was an all metal construction (almost all aircraft until then were fabric and wood construction). Such a design & construction would be without any external wires or braces. Furthermore the wings could be hollow and the space used to house passengers, cargo and fuel. His designs were used by the Germans in WW1 and later in WW2 (he was ousted from his company in 1933 by the Nazis). 

The G-38 of 1929 was a major innovation of his blended wing concept and was for a time the largest landbased aircraft in the World. The passengers were seated in the wings which were 5 feet 7 inches thick at the root. The leading edges of the wings had sculpted windows giving passengers a panoramic view as they flew. There were three 11 seat cabins,in addition to smoking & wash rooms. The wings had a gangway through them that allowed mechanics to work on engines while inflight, a first. There were two operating aircraft and flew through to 1941(both flew until 1936)  before the final one crashed.

The G.38 schematic . Pic Source : Wikipedia

The Mitsubishi Ki-20 was based on the Junkers G-38. Six were built as heavy bombers between 1931-35. During WW2 they saw active combat. These aircraft were considered secret and their existence only made public in 1940.

Nicolas Woyevodsky was a Russian Aerodynamicist who filed a 1911 patent called ‘Aircraft’. Here’s where the patent gets interesting. It was filed in the United States in 1911 and granted in 1921 ( how and why did a Russian file for a patent in the USA and why did it take so long?). Not much else is known about this path breaking scientist other than his name, country of origin and patent.

The patent spoke of a continuous airfoil section integrating the fuselage and wings, what we now call the BWB. The patent further described a triangular shaped body with pterygoid (triangular) aerofoil sections that enclosed the engines and passengers. Such a construction would reduce drag and weight enhancing lift. This was considered revolutionary as most aircraft were biplanes with separate fuselage and wings.

The Westland Dreadnought. Pic Source: Wikipedia

Woyevodsky’s 1921 patent led to wind tunnel tests (probably in Russia & Britain) and validated his theory which led to designer GTR Hill of Westland designing and building the dreadnought. GTR Hill was already experimenting with the Westland Pterodactyl. The Pterodactyl was a revolutionary flying wing and flew through the 1920s & 30s in the hunt for a safer aircraft. The Dreadnought unfortunately crashed on its very first flight. After an initial stable take off and stable flight the Dreadnought stalled at 100 feet altitude and crashed, seriously injuring the pilot. The design was abandoned at the time, however It is recognized and appreciated by history.

The British further tried to pursue the BWB airliner design in the late 1930s & 40s through the Miles M.26 & M.30. The data was useful, however a full scale prototype was never constructed.

The BWF (Blended Wing Fuselage)

The timeline between the 1940s & 1990s is a BWB gap (very similar to the flying wings but longer, aviation development had moved rapidly in the direction of conventional aircraft ),except for the military applications between the 1950s – 1980s when the BWF was used. The A-12 Oxcart and its successor the  SR-71 pioneered the BWF design. The BWF integrates the fuselage and wings in a smooth aerodynamic transition, however the fuselage continues to be a distinct structure. 

The SR-71 schematics. The fuselage chine clearly visible. Pic Source : Wikipedia

Such a design used the fuselage as a lifting body, and the chines around the body contribute between 15-30% of total lift generated. The design used Area ruling and mitigated parasitic & wave drag through smooth transitions.

In the 1970s the Rockwell B-1 introduced variable geometry to the BWF. The wings pivoted on 6 ton hinges which are buried inside a wide fuselage. The BWF of the B-1B contributes approx 15-20% of the total required lift. 

The B-1B Lancer & The Tu-160 Blackjack. Note their similarities. The BWF clearly visible on both. Pic Source: Wikipedia

The Tu-160 which has a very similar design to the B-1 has an even larger BWF. The BWF contributed approx 18-25% of the total lift in supersonic flight.

All the aircraft mentioned had variable geometry inlets of various types (spikes / ramps).

The BWB Evolution

The Generation 1 BWB’s commenced in the 1990s and ran through to the 2010s. They represented the ‘ High Risk High Reward’ approach to BWBs where they envisioned extra large 800 seat BWBs with maximum aerodynamic efficiency. This meant Boundary Layer Ingestion (BLI) of the engines and integrating them inside the airframe. This proved to be difficult to accomplish & certify.

The NASA/McDonnell Douglas Studies were funded by NASA between 1993-96. The studies included wind tunnel tests of tailless BWB concepts at 1-6% scale. Models tested had the centre body contributing between 31-43% of total lift and exhibited between 6-8% fuel savings. 

NASA BWB-17 was tested between 1997-2000. With a 17 foot wingspan, the 6% scale RC model was built by Stanford University for NASA. The model demonstrated low drag and had centrebody lift of between 30-40%. The model proved BWB flight handling with a tailless design. The BWB-17 had stability issues and needed artificial stabilization to correct. The model further highlighted scaling & control issues on larger aircraft.

The BWB-17 by NASA. Pic Source : NASA

Boeing Phantom Works BWB studies ran between 2000-2007. Post the McDonnell Douglas acquisition of 1997, Boeing continued to build on the earlier program that ran between 1993-96. 

Part of the program was to construct the 35 foot wingspan X-48A demonstrator in 2004, however the program was cancelled before construction began. In 2005 a 12 foot wingspan BWB model was constructed to study transonic aerodynamics in a wind tunnel. This model exhibited a 15-20% drag reduction and lift to drag ratio of 20-23. As the project was for 450 seat passenger airliners it highlighted manufacturing complexity & airport compatibility issues.

The Boeing X-48B program ran between 2007-2010. It was a 8.5% scale 21 foot wingspan model that was powered by three jet engines and flew between Mach 0.3-0.7. The centrebody contributed 35% of the lift and had L/D improvements of approx 20% over conventional designs. The X-48B continued to have challenges with yaw handling and full size scaling. Furthermore engine out control and stall characteristics were tested and needed improvement. The aircraft needed artificial stability management.

The X-48B. Pic Source : NASA

The Generation 2 BWBs run from approx 2010 to date. Gen 2 highlights a safety first approach to design and has podded engines mounted above the airframe. The realistic path sacrificed potential efficiencies for safety with the approach. The Gen 2 BWBs also explored different propulsion types.

NASA N2A/B/C BWB concepts ran between 2010-2015. The concept was for a 300-450 passenger aircraft. Conducted in partnership with Boeing the N2A had two podded engines mounted on top of the upper surface of the aircraft. Wind tunnel testing was done to study its aerodynamic and acoustic performance at low speeds. The N2B used BLI and had embedded engines. While the N2B showed improvements over the performance of the N2A, the embedded engines increased manufacturing complexity. The N2C was a supersonic concept. The data gleaned from these concepts was to inform the future aviation industry on future design areas.

The Boeing X-48C first flew in 2012. With a wingspan of 21 feet it was a 8.5% scale of a large transporter. The C was focussed on noise reduction and featured vertical surfaces adjacent to the engines.The Modified X-48B had an extended aft fuselage on which the engines were mounted. It completed its 30th and final flight in 2013.

 

The X-48C. Pic Source : NASA

NASA N3-X Hybrid Wing Body that ran between 2013-2018 is a concept design. NASA tests such concepts through computer simulations and & wind tunnels. The research was on advanced technologies and propulsion. Some of the concepts explored included Turbo Electric Distributed Propulsion where instead of large engines, smaller electric fans distributed propulsion across the aircraft. Another concept explored was the Superconducting Power System, where superconducting technology allows for high power density with minimum energy loss. Others included wingtip generators and liquid hydrogen cooling. 

The N3-X can achieve a 70% reduction in fuel burn, significantly lower emissions and noise levels while maintaining performance at the same time.

The Airbus Maverick began development in 2017. With a wingspan of 10.6 feet and a length of 6.7 feet, the Maverick had two engines to the rear with each having a vertical fin on it. The model explored aerodynamic and technical specifications and results were encouraging .

The Airbus Maverick. Pic Source : Airbus

Airbus has further built on its BWB program by targeting 2035 as the first year for a zero emission aircraft. Such an aircraft would use hydrogen combustion or cells for propulsion. Storing Hydrogen is a big challenge in aviation and the BWB is considered an excellent test design. Airbus is further  studying conventional aircraft for its zero emission program. 

JetZero 

JetZero is founded by Mark Page a BWB pioneer. He was part of the seminal NASA / McDonnell Douglas collaboration on the BWB program as technical program manager. NASA concieved the program as a challenge to rethink aircraft design for greater efficiency. The program (although Mark was not part of it after 1996) culminated in the BWB-17(spoken of earlier) the very first BWB of the modern era. It was inspired By Northrop’s flying wings of the 1940s but was a completely fresh approach to aircraft design. The BWB design was co-created with Robert Liebeck & Blaine Rawdon and offered 20-30% better L/D ratios than conventional aircraft. The three of them authored ‘Beyond Tube and Wing’ in 2020 in which they charted the path to the BWB design.

The philosophy was Multidiciplanry Optimization (MDO) integrationg aerodynamics, engines, stability and internal structures to minimize drag and maximize efficiency. Page virewed the BWB as the fundamental reimagining of an aircraft blending wing and body into a seamless flowing structure. In one presentation Page mentioned imagine a Boeing 777 fuselage cut up into three parts and placed side by side. You then stick wings on the first and last sections, the middle one being the longest (with the cockpit) and place the engines on top of the stacked side by side fuselage, and lastly smooth them all together into one fused structure.

Page’s contributions influenced the X-48B/C programs as well. These programs validated the theory of BWBs with subscale models and wind tunnel testing. They sorted out  issues such as space by moving the main landing gear to the rear of the aircraft from the centre, saving space and increasing passenger numbers another example is sorting out pitch stability control issues with belly flaps, every thought had to be out of the box.

Later in 2012 Page co-founded DZYNE Technologies as chief scientist & VP and here he continued to focus on aircraft with high lifting efficiency , but the BWB bug was always there, first as a business jet and later as an airliner. In 2021 Page along with Tom O’Leary founded JetZero to take forward the BWB vision.

Page has mentioned that startups like JetZero are ideally placed to revolutionize the aircraft manufacturing space as they do not have massive legacy businesses that need to transition ex : Boeing & Airbus.

So far it has walked the talk with Alaska & United Airlines investing in JetZero through their investment arms. Delta Airlines is a strategic partner sharing expertize from a customer engagement perspective. In addition JetZero are talking to 14 other airlines and the USAF has awarded a $235 million contract to JetZero to build a full scale demonstrator, but we are getting ahead of ourselves.

The 12.5% scale JetZero pathfinder with its 21 foot wingspan first flew in 2023 and received FAA clearance in 2024. The USAF found the Pathfinder to exhibit similar characteristics to the X-48 program and has given the go ahead to JetZero to create a full scale demonstrator which is to be ready by the first quarter of 2027. The demonstrator is being constructed by Scaled Composites founded by the legendary Burt Rutan who has aircraft/spacecraft such as Spaceship One (won the Ansari X Prize) and Stratolaunch to his credit. Scaled Composites is now part of Northrop Grumman (its amazing the name Northrop is involved here, a doff of the hat to Jack Northrop).

The Z4 is a multirole platform and can be used for both passengers & military applications such as a sky tanker (the USAF is looking at the KC-Z4 as a replacement to its aging KC-135 tanker). To cut down the development & certification runway JetZero will be using Commercial off the shelf (COTS) parts where possible. 

The KC-Z4. Pic Source : JetZero Website

The engine choice is Pratt & Whitney PW2040 each generating approx 43,000 pounds of thrust. These are the very engines that powered the Boeing 757 & the Boeing C-17 Globemaster. While the design of the engines might be almost 50 years old, they are tried and tested and have a solid track record. Delta have provided three engines for the demonstrator. These engines are more than capable of managing the Z4s 5,000 nm range and cruise altitude of 45,000 feet. They will obviously be modernized for the production models. In future the Z4 might be offered with newer engines. Mark Page did note they were not looking for perfect tech, but are more interested in proving the airframe.

The JetZero Z4. Pic Source : JetZero Website

The fuselage ( after the demonstrator)will be made of composites and be manufactured at their Greensboro facility. Some of the other innovations it will have are shorter landing gear to enhance low speed handling, cargo door matching the KC-10 size (USAF applications). The passenger experience stresses comfort & efficiency (the 3D renderings on the JetZero website look stunning).

The personal passenger experience aims to revolutionized by offering larger seats, flexible cabin layout and dedicated overhead bin space (have forgotten what this feels like!). Instead of physical windows JetZero plans on high definition exterior cameras that provide a live view on digital windows. There is a possibility of overhead windows as well in addition to mood lighting.

While the overall exterior design of the aircraft is very sculpted, Page and his colleagues came up with a ‘ T ‘ shaped plug solution to scaling up the aircraft to either smaller or larger capacities, this means the aircraft construction has to be modular in nature almost like ‘LEGO’ !! They did this back in the 90s and the 25 year limit on the patent has expired, in Page’s own words “ I am happy to have it back” !

Page giving a DZYNE Technologies presentation in 2018 where describes the T shaped plugs that sum up the scalability of the BWB. Note their similarities plugs next to the engines. Pic Source : Page presentation off YT

Mark Page emphasizes pragmitism over perfection and this is achieved by delivering on the USAF contract, using milestones to attact fresh funding (the Z4 is expected to cost approx $5-7bn to develop as per Jon Ostrower of TAC) and target the largest market segment for aircraft the 200-250 passenger aircraft market worth over $2.5 Bn per annum. With projected savings of 50%, this will be a no-brainer for airlines future fleet decision making.

BWBs have promises to keep…..

Please be sure to read Part 1 of the two part series which details the evolution of the flying wing in detail at http://theaviationevangelist.com/2025/09/13/the-evolution-of-the-flying-wing-part-one/

End of Part 2

For more deep dive easy to read articles please go to https://theaviationevangelist.com do keep scrolling down, and do share

Follow me:

LinkedIn : https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-aviation-evangelist/

X : @ManiRayaprolu

Reddit : r/theaviationevangelist

Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61583497868441#

https://www.instagram.com/theaviationevangelist?igsh=ZjA5YXI3MWd3OGZs&utm_source=qr